Table 5.
Application of standard addition technique using the proposed methods
| Method | Pharmaceutical (µg/mL) | Remdesivir | MFX | ||
| Pure added (µg/mL) | % R * | Pure added (µg/mL) | % R * | ||
| Ratio derivative |
RDV 1 (1.01)* MFX 4 (3.93)* |
1 | 98.18 | 3 | 99.34 |
| 2 | 99.03 | 4 | 101.27 | ||
| 3 | 98.01 | 5 | 100.07 | ||
| Mean | 98.41 | 100.23 | |||
| %RSD | 0.552 | 0.973 | |||
| Ratio difference |
RDV 1 (1.01)* MFX 4 (4.07)* |
1 | 100.92 | 3 | 99.05 |
| 2 | 99.98 | 4 | 100.57 | ||
| 3 | 100.65 | 5 | 98.48 | ||
| Mean | 100.52 | 99.36 | |||
| %RSD | 0.486 | 1.086 | |||
| Mean centering |
RDV 1 (0.99)* MFX 4 (3.97)* |
1 | 98.40 | 3 | 101.94 |
| 2 | 100.23 | 4 | 99.06 | ||
| 3 | 98.21 | 5 | 100.35 | ||
| Mean | 98.95 | 100.45 | |||
| %RSD | 1.129 | 1.436 | |||
| Area under curve method |
RDV 1 (1.02)* MFX 4 (3.92)* |
1 | 100.88 | 3 | 99.79 |
| 2 | 98.36 | 4 | 99.93 | ||
| 3 | 100.56 | 5 | 98.06 | ||
| Mean | 99.94 | 99.26 | |||
| %RSD | 1.373 | 1.052 | |||
| Q-analysis method |
RDV 1 (0.99)* MFX 4 (3.97)* |
1 | 100.31 | 3 | 101.80 |
| 2 | 100.11 | 4 | 100.74 | ||
| 3 | 98.86 | 5 | 101.51 | ||
| Mean | 99.76 | 101.35 | |||
| %RSD | 0.788 | 0.540 | |||
| Bivariate method |
RDV 1 (0.99)* MFX 4 (3.93)* |
1 | 101.65 | 3 | 98.33 |
| 2 | 98.95 | 4 | 101.75 | ||
| 3 | 98.81 | 5 | 98.52 | ||
| Mean | 98.80 | 99.53 | |||
| %RSD | 1.602 | 1.927 | |||
* Average of three determinations