Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 21;19(1):246. doi: 10.1186/s13065-025-01607-x

Table 6.

Statistical study and determination of RDV and MFX in pharmaceutical formulations using the proposed spectrophotometric and previously described methods

Parameters RDV MFX
1DD RD MC AUC Q-analysis Bivariate Reported method [15] 1DD RD MC AUC Q-analysis Bivariate Reported method [36]
Number of measurements 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
Mean % Recovery 100.42 99.73 98.94 100.15 99.14 98.90 99.79 99.35 100.81 99.19 98.56 99.96 100.96 99.49
% RSD 1.142 1.213 0.792 1.958 0.922 0.688 1.197 1.046 0.893 0.877 0.539 0.601 1.054 1.496
Variance 1.316 1.463 0.616 3.845 1.427 0.463 1.427 0.172 0.811 0.756 0.282 0.361 1.132 2.216
Student’s t-test * (2.447) 0.761 0.084 1.183 0.311 0.861 1.292 —— 1.375 1.521 0.347 1.178 0.591 1.607 ——
F-value* (9.277) 1.085 1.024 2.320 2.693 1.708 3.087 —— 2.050 2.732 2.929 7.855 6.131 1.957 ——

* The values in parenthesis are tabulated values of “t ” and “F ” at (p = 0.05) [69]