Skip to main content
letter
. 2025 Aug 22;14:109. doi: 10.1186/s40164-025-00700-0

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The role of the adaptive immune system in the anticancer activity of Triapine. (A) Top 20 upregulated GO-terms in a transcriptomic dataset (SW480, 1 µM Triapine, 15 h) compared to control. (B) Impact of immune status on the anticancer activity of Triapine in murine allograft models. Mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SEM is given. (C) Flow cytometry analysis on day seven of CT-26 tumor-infiltrating immune cells of female Balb/c mice. Mean percent cells of the (grand)parental gate ± SD is given. Effect of a CD8-blocking antibody on (D) tumor growth (mean tumor volume (mm3) ± SEM) of Triapine-treated CT-26 allografts and (E) overall survival. Pink lines indicate Triapine treatment. (F) Representative confocal microscopy images of CT-26 cells stained for CALR (green) and DAPI (blue) after 24 h Triapine treatment (10 µM, scale bar: 50 μm). (G) Flow cytometry analysis of CALR (24 h). (H) Representative fluorescence images and (I) associated quantification of CT-26 cells stained for HMGB1(green) and DAPI (blue) after 24 h Triapine treatment (10 µM; scale bar: 15 μm). Triapine induced (J) HMGB1 and (K) ATP release into the supernatant after 24 h treatment. Values given are the mean ± SD of at least three independent experiments, normalized to untreated control. (L) Percentage of tumor-free mice at the site of re-challenge site after vaccination with Triapine-treated cancer cells. The control group received freezed/thawed (F/T)-lysed cells. Significant differences were calculated by mixed-effects analysis corrected for multiple comparisons by Sidak, unpaired T-test, one-way, two-way ANOVA corrected for multiple comparisons by Sidak or Dunnett, or Log-rank and Mantel-Cox post-test (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05, n.s. = not significant)