Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;26:810. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-09075-z

Table 2.

Difference of radiographic parameters between one- and two-level osteotomy groups

Parameters Groups Preoperative Postoperative Final Follow-up Correction Loss of Correction
PT One-level 37.4 ± 12.0 26.4 ± 11.5 31.7 ± 10.6 11.1 ± 10.6 5.3 ± 5.9
Two-level 36.0 ± 13.4 26.0 ± 9.7 34.3 ± 12.0 11.2 ± 11.6 8.2 ± 5.6
PI One-level 46.0 ± 12.4 45.5 ± 12.1 44.6 ± 10.8 0.4 ± 3.4 0.9 ± 4.1
Two-level 49.9 ± 14.0 49.8 ± 12.0 50.0 ± 9.8 0.1 ± 4.6 0.2 ± 3.4
SS One-level 8.5 ± 11.9* 19.2 ± 10.8 13.0 ± 13.2 10.7 ± 9.7 6.2 ± 7.7
Two-level 14.4 ± 13.1* 23.8 ± 11.6 15.8 ± 7.5 9.3 ± 12.1 8.0 ± 5.5
LL One-level 7.4 ± 21.7* −35.8 ± 16.0 −33.4 ± 18.9 43.3 ± 17.5 2.5 ± 8.4
Two-level 18.9 ± 21.9* −30.1 ± 22.9 −25.5 ± 19.6 49.0 ± 21.4 4.6 ± 5.3
TK One-level 54.3 ± 16.2* 50.0 ± 15.8 52.9 ± 10.7 4.3 ± 11.4*, † 2.9 ± 5.5
Two-level 65.0 ± 17.2* 44.3 ± 19.7 45.6 ± 21.4 20.6 ± 20.1*, † 1.3 ± 3.8
GK One-level 90.2 ± 11.7* 35.9 ± 14.2 42.2 ± 16.0* 54.2 ± 13.8*, † 6.3 ± 7.8
Two-level 110.2 ± 20.6* 32.0 ± 18.6 31.7 ± 15.5* 78.2 ± 24.3*, † 0.3 ± 6.4
SVA One-level 23.9 ± 9.3* 9.2 ± 5.9* 7.6 ± 5.1 14.7 ± 7.0*, † 1.5 ± 4.1
Two-level 31.4 ± 7.2* 11.9 ± 6.1* 10.8 ± 7.7 19.5 ± 6.6*, † 1.1 ± 4.1
OVA One-level - 47.4 ± 13.0* 45.3 ± 13.3* - 2.1 ± 2.9
Two-level - 72.4 ± 15.1* 72.0 ± 14.6* - 0.4 ± 5.9
CBVA One-level 41.7 ± 26.2* 8.6 ± 11.4 6.9 ± 9.4 33.1 ± 22.4*, † 1.7 ± 10.8
Two-level 83.1 ± 33.3* 10.8 ± 12.2 6.9 ± 10.1 72.4 ± 30.1*, † 3.9 ± 5.4

PT pelvic tilt, PI pelvic incidence, SS sacral slope, LL lumbar lordosis, TK thoracic kyphosis, GK global kyphosis, SVA sagittal vertical axis, OVA osteotomized vertebra angle, CBVA chin-brow vertical angle

* Indicates a statistically significant difference between one- and two-level osteotomy groups (P < 0.05)

Indicates a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative values (P < 0.05)