Table 3.
Summary of functional connectivity analysis findings in major depressive disorder.
| Researchers | Aim | Material and methods | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. (2015) | Evaluation of the structure of functional brain networks in patients with depression and healthy individuals during emotion processing using graph theory | Traditional EEG (59 electrodes); coherence and graph theory analysis (clustering, path length) in delta–gamma bands. 16 patients with depression, 14 healthy subjects | Depressed patients show higher coherence and more randomized network topology, especially in the gamma band |
| Siegle et al. (2010) | Investigate differences in emotional processing by analyzing gamma EEG after negative words in healthy people, people with depression and people with schizophrenia | Task: identifying emotions in words during traditional EEG; gamma band analysis (35–45 Hz). 24 healthy subjects, 14 patients with depression, 15 patients with schizophrenia | Depressed individuals showed prolonged and increased gamma activity after negative stimuli. |
| Sun et al. (2020) | To identify effective EEG biomarkers for recognizing depression, with a focus on functional brain connectivity features. | Resting-state EEG data were collected from 24 MDD patients and 29 healthy controls using a 128-channel HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net. | PLI outperformed linear and nonlinear features. The highest classification accuracy (82.31%) was achieved using ReliefF feature selection and logistic regression. |
| Lee et al. (2011) | To assess whether the strength of functional EEG connections can predict the response to depression treatment after 8 weeks of SSRI treatment. | 3-minute resting EEG (eyes closed) recorded in 108 patients with MDD. Connectivity strengths in responders and non-responders compared after 8 weeks | Stronger frontotemporal connections in the delta/theta band were associated with a poorer response to treatment |
| Bares et al. (2008) | To assess whether the decrease in QEEG theta coherence in the prefrontal brain area after 1 week of venlafaxine treatment can predict the clinical response in treatment-resistant patients. | 25 hospitalized patients with MDD, QEEG recorded at baseline and after 1 week of treatment | An early decrease in the theta coherence may be a useful marker for predicting the effectiveness of venlafaxine |
| Cook et al. (2002) | To assess whether changes in QEEG theta-correlation in the prefrontal cortex can predict the clinical response to treatment with fluoxetine or venlafaxine. | 51 patients with unipolar depression; EEG recorded at 3 time points | Only drug-responders showed a significant decrease in prefrontal coherence after 48 hours and 7 days |
| Bares et al. (2015) | To assess the effectiveness of QEEG theta-correlation in the prefrontal cortex as a predictor of response to venlafaxine ER in patients with MDD. | 50 patients with MDD; QEEG performed at baseline, after 1 and 4 weeks | A decrease in coherence in the first week occurred in all responders in both groups |
| Armitage (1995) | Summary of 10 years of research on the microarchitecture of sleep in the traditional EEG of patients with depression | Review of sleep EEG studies in people with depression (both in episode and remission), compared with other clinical and control groups | Reduced delta activity in early sleep, increased fast EEG (especially in the right hemisphere) and reduced interhemispheric coherence are observed |