Table 4.
Determinants of continuum of care completionamong women with and without disability in LMICs
| Variables | Model I AOR (95% CI) | Model II AOR (95% CI) | Model III AOR (95% CI) | P-Value |
| Disability status | ||||
| No disability | 1.0 | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Have disability | 0.88 (0.82, 0.94) | 0.89 (0.83, 0.95) | ||
| Age of respondents | ||||
| 15–24 | 1.0(reference) | |||
| 25–29 | 1.09 (1.02, 1.16) | 1.05 (0.98, 1.12) | 0.163 | |
| 30–34 | 1.13 (1.05, 1.22) | 1.08 (1.00, 1.16) | 0.044 | |
| 35–49 | 1.00 (0.93, 1.07) | 0.96 (0.89, 1.03) | 0.219 | |
| Educational status | ||||
| No education | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Primary | 1.61 (1.49, 1.74) | 1.63 (1.51, 1.76) | 0.000 | |
| Secondary or higher | 2.57 (2.37, 2.79) | 2.27 (2.09, 2.46) | 0.000 | |
| Sex of head of household | ||||
| Male | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Female | 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) | 1.14 (1.07, 1.22) | 0.000 | |
| Wealth Index | ||||
| Poorest | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Poorer | 1.25 (1.15, 1.35) | 1.24 (1.14, 1.35) | 0.000 | |
| Middle | 1.51 (1.38, 1.65) | 1.46 (1.33, 1.60) | 0.000 | |
| Richer | 1.88 (1.70, 2.07) | 1.72 (1.55, 1.90) | 0.000 | |
| Richest | 2.48 (2.24, 2.75) | 2.18 (1.95, 2.43) | 0.000 | |
| Pregnancy wanted | ||||
| Intended | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Unintended | 0.77 (0.72, 0.82) | 0.83 (0.78, 0.89) | 0.000 | |
| Respondents currently working | ||||
| No | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Yes | 1.15 (1.09, 1.22) | 1.29 (1.22, 1.37) | 0.000 | |
| Marital Status | ||||
| Not married/Not in union | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Married/Live with partner | 1.10 (1.01, 1.19) | 1.02 (0.94, 1.11) | 0.648 | |
| Delivery by caesarean section | ||||
| Yes | 2.84 (2.60, 3.10) | 2.69 (2.46, 2.93) | 0.000 | |
| No | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Ever had terminated pregnancy | ||||
| Yes | 1.19 (1.11, 1.27) | 1.15 (1.08, 1.23) | 0.000 | |
| No | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Health care barrier | ||||
| Not a big problem | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Big problem | 0.84 (0.79, 0.88) | 0.81 (0.76, 0.85) | 0.000 | |
| Community level predictors | ||||
| Region | ||||
| Sub-Saharan Africa | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| South and south-east Asia | 1.72 (1.58, 1.87) | 1.68 (1.56, 1.82) | 0.000 | |
| Residence | ||||
| Urban | 2.46 (2.26, 2.68) | 1.36 (1.25, 1.49) | 0.000 | |
| Rural | 1.0(reference) | 1.0(reference) | ||
| Community level media exposure | ||||
| High | 1.11 (1.02, 1.22) | 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) | 0.466 | |
| Low | 1.0(reference) | |||
| Community level poverty | ||||
| High | 1.01 (0.92, 1.11) | 1.06 (0.97, 1.15) | 0.183 | |
| Low | 1.0(reference) | |||
| Model parameters | Null model | Model I | Model II | Model III |
| ICC | 7.8% | 6.4% | 8.0% | 6.0% |
| PCV | Reference | 0.1926 | −0.0342 | 0.2419 |
| Log likelihood | −34533.2 | −30176.0 | −33298.8 | −29880.7 |
| AIC | 69070.4 | 60390.1 | 66609.62 | 59807.4 |
| BIC | 69088.1 | 60558.4 | 66,663 | 60011.2 |