Skip to main content
MedEdPublish logoLink to MedEdPublish
. 2024 Dec 10;14:12. Originally published 2024 Mar 20. [Version 3] doi: 10.12688/mep.20175.3

Navigating uncertain waters: 12 tips for medical department social media engagement under shifting platform landscapes

Zachary Van Roy 1, Kelly A Cawcutt 2, Jasmine R Marcelin 2,a
PMCID: PMC12372415  PMID: 40860789

Version Changes

Revised. Amendments from Version 2

This version includes expanded commentary regarding risks to patient privacy in the context of SoMe posts. Additions were made to the introduction and Tip 4 to accommodate these changes.

Abstract

Social media has revolutionized how society receives and transmits information in the digital age, including healthcare. While the future of social media platforms remains uncertain, the benefits of social media for healthcare organizations, departments, and divisions are clear when compared to traditional communication methods, including improved recruitment efforts, increased promotion of faculty work, rapid dissemination of information and education innovations, and accelerated professional networking. Consequently, preferred platforms may shift but the benefits of social media likely cement it, in one form or another, in medical education and society at large. The strategic development of a social media presence at the department level can be opaque and overwhelming amidst varying mediums, yet the benefits of use have never been more important. Here, we present 12 tips for developing a successful social media presence as a healthcare department, addressing the creation of a purposeful social media strategy and crucial considerations for any platform, current or future, at all levels of development.

Keywords: social media, engagement, tips, department strategy

Introduction

In the three decades since the World Wide Web launched in the public domain, it has thoroughly restructured how society shares information. The academic medicine migration to social media (SoMe) is evident in the advent of “medical Twitter” (#MedTwitter) 1 and various other loosely defined subsets of the SoMe sphere dedicated to medical topics and specialties. Most medical institutions and many departments have an active Facebook page 2 , and an increasing number are expanding into other SoMe platforms, including X (formerly Twitter), Instagram, YouTube 3 , and LinkedIn 4 . SoMe interventions have been linked to increased knowledge 5, 6 , empathy 7 , reflective writing skills 8, 9 , and engagement with educators within the medical community 10 . The healthcare workforce additionally experiences unrestricted emersion in medical knowledge and advancements, historically restricted to publications or conference attendance 11, 12 . Further, research articles shared on SoMe had significantly higher readership than non-promoted work by a factor of 5–10 fold 13 , with additional increases in article altmetric scores and subsequent citations 14 . SoMe is also a valuable advocacy tool for healthcare professionals employing mission-based engagement 15 , and additionally functions as a means to build one’s medical professional network 16 , especially for women and underrepresented populations 12, 17 .

Despite these benefits, there are also potential harms to engaging on social media. Studies conducted before and during the COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated increased experiences of targeted harassment and discrimination among women and those from demographic backgrounds underrepresented in medicine 18, 19 . This has led many healthcare professionals to consider leaving SoMe despite the potential professional benefits 18, 20 . Concomitantly, concerns regarding the spread of health misinformation on SoMe platforms have recently been systematically verified 21 , showing the highest levels of misinformation on X (formerly Twitter) commonly surrounding tobacco and drug use, vaccines, and non-communicable diseases. However, even when information is shared in good faith, SoMe platforms enable unprecedented amplification of missteps, such as HIPAA violations and breaches of patient privacy. These potential and realized harms necessitate careful interaction with SoMe to avoid negative consequences. That said, individual engagement in these platforms is ubiquitous among healthcare professionals in academic medical centers, with slower uptake in recognition of the value of meaningful professional engagement for promotion and tenure. However, blueprints for accurately documenting these activities on curriculum vitae 22 and incorporating these contributions into the promotion and tenure process have been published 23 .

Further complicating effective SoMe use is the turbulent stability of social media websites when viewed through a longitudinal lens. Unlike departmental blogs hosted locally on institutional servers or newsletter communications distributed via email, SoMe engagement relies on external services which may be destabilized due to any combination of social, political, or financial factors. Illustrating this, the SoMe platform X (formerly Twitter) has undergone significant changes with new ownership, including newfound algorithmic amplification of anger-associated posts 18, 24 and anti-science movements 25 , leading many to question the long-term viability of the site 20 . With this and the implementation of a mandatory paid tier for X site utilization in some countries which could be universal in the future 26 , many programs without a current SoMe strategy may feel discouraged from installing a SoMe presence or those with a current account may question whether it is worth maintaining their activity on a platform with an uncertain future. While these are valid concerns, they do not diminish the clear benefits of SoMe engagement on the department level. As new platforms are formed, they are likely to have similar core features and functionality as current offerings 27 . Therefore, with small adjustments, a thoughtfully-devised SoMe strategy can be fluid across platforms, enabling departments to shift with the SoMe landscape without losing engagement.

Recognizing the potential benefits and harms of SoMe engagement, there has never been a better time to develop an active, thoughtful, and generalized SoMe strategy designed to work across platforms at the department level to support, amplify, and, to some extent, protect faculty. We present 12 tips for establishing a successful social media presence as a department, recognizing the steep learning curve presented by new and ever-shifting SoMe platforms. The first six tips act as a stepwise operational guide to setting up a SoMe presence informed by the literature and using the University of Nebraska Medical Center Infectious Disease Division (UNMC ID) SoMe experience as a case study. The last six tips represent essential troubleshooting considerations for any department accounts, especially with an uncertain and fluid SoMe landscape.

Tip 1

Setting goals – Defining the ‘why’

The benefits of implementing SoMe at the department level are too broad for a one-size-fits-all approach to establishing an impactful online presence. The first step for developing a department’s online presence is similar to building an individual presence – answering the question, “Why is this account needed”? Identify strategic goals for the use of social media. One goal, as identified for UNMC ID, may be to increase the national recognition and readership of department faculty members’ work. Another may be engaging in more productive faculty or fellowship recruitment. Identify specific shortcomings you wish to improve upon as a department and pen them in ink. This will help inform your SoMe strategy as you develop your platform. The realized benefits will depend on how the platforms are used to achieve the goals.

Tip 2

Assemble a team

With these goals in mind, the next step is establishing a SoMe team responsible for executing the strategy. Team members should have strengths that apply to digital media and the preset department goals, and each member should have distinct responsibilities. For example, if the strategy involves implementing multiple platforms, primary responsibility for each platform may be delegated to a different team member or cross posting may be more easily facilitated via an automated 3 rd party service. Your team may need to grow with the advent of new platforms and members may need to shift to alternative platforms should one become nonviable. Importantly, early and sustained adoption of new services in parallel with established platforms are most likely to yield account success. Content curation takes time and effort, so FTE-protected time, monetary compensation, and administrative support should be budgeted wherever possible. Identify and amplify team accomplishments in real-time and make room for team creative license. When competing for the readers’ attention, encouraging creative use of SoMe will foster the development of attention-grabbing and share-worthy content necessary for platform success.

Tip 3

Plan a route

After assembling the team, designing a SoMe strategy involves defining five different variables: audience(s), platform(s), SoMe-specific goal(s), message(s), and how success will be defined.

The audience may be as narrow as subspecialists within the department or as broad as any member of the public interested in healthcare (or, more likely, both). Identification of the target population will help you craft appropriate and relevant content. SoMe efforts at UNMC ID focused on both infectious disease (ID) specialists and the public with a mix of nuanced infectious disease content and broadly applicable ID posts.

The choice of platform(s) will be heavily influenced by the target audience(s) and team skill sets/resources. Currently, patients are generally more likely to frequent Facebook or YouTube pages 28 . At the same time, academic healthcare professionals from other institutions have previously been described as primarily using X (formerly Twitter) or alternative social networks (see #MedTwitter 1 or #IDTwitter). A blog is best used for targeting local healthcare professionals and the lay public familiar with the institution. Importantly, new social media platforms routinely emerge or gain increased popularity (i.e., Reddit, TikTok, Tumblr, Quora, Threads), which may alter the landscape of users targeted. Illustrating this, TikTok and similar short video-based platforms by YouTube and Facebook have recently become popular, and the expansion of medical influence on these platforms is beginning to prove a successful strategy 29 (i.e., Dermatology ‘DermTok’); however, concerns over misinformation and reliability of content shared by non-healthcare professionals remains a significant concern 30, 31 . Even within established platforms, features often change over time. The social network X (formerly Twitter) has seen rapid shifts in features associated with its premium “verified” status. Consideration of attaining verified account status for institutional accounts should be approached on a case-by-case basis. The potential benefits of increased public trust once associated with verified account status must be balanced with the current rigor and qualifications (or lack thereof) associated with attaining this status when weighing this decision at the departmental level. Close attention should be paid to shifting SoMe trends and the strategy should be adjusted accordingly. Occasionally, a predicted mass exodus from a SoMe platform may not materialize, so quick adoption and slow abandonment of accounts is likely to be a fruitful component of SoMe strategy.

SoMe objectives should be targeted at achieving strategic goals by providing a mix of content that the target audience(s) can search for, understand, and follow. In practice, this usually means posting a combination of expert-targeted and public-targeted content. The message should be unique, with content that stimulates conversation without sacrificing informational integrity. Consistent messaging will project the department’s image as an expert resource for content, clinical information, and potential speakers in your field. The UNMCID blog 32 was initially designed to showcase faculty introductions, achievements, and publications. Over time, the modified strategy included article summaries, journal club recaps, pharmacy reviews, special interest pieces, and pieces on current ID trends to better capture the attention of a larger audience.

Success can be measured through SoMe metrics and progress toward the department goals. SoMe metric goals may include a posts-per-month quota, follower/subscriber count, or article access counts. These metrics measure the effectiveness of SoMe implementation and execution. Department goal tracking should be individualized but could include tracking faculty speaker invitations, number of applications to trainee or faculty positions, or collaboration invitations over time. There is currently little information available regarding which metrics are the best benchmarks for departmental SoMe success; the individualized nature of SoMe strategy and department goals makes this difficult to define broadly. Success should be defined and measured internally and individually as a reflection of metrics that pertain to predetermined SoMe goals.

Tip 4

All-aboard: Work to get faculty and Public Relations (PR) department to buy into SoMe to maximize impact

The first and most important partner in initially setting up a department’s SoMe presence is the institution’s public relations (PR) or strategic communications department. They will likely be most concerned with ensuring the team has a formalized strategy and can help teams understand their organization’s SoMe policies. They may ask to provide initial oversight over a calendar of prescheduled posts to ensure the new SoMe account meets the institution’s standards and can be a significant asset as they can advise how to best communicate with the chosen audience.

Department faculty (and staff, trainees, depending on the department) will likely be the strongest ally in amplifying content to reach a wider audience. Recruit many interested members to join SoMe and foster engagement with formal Faculty Development programs to provide broader SoMe training for faculty, staff, and trainees. However, this effort must be accompanied by careful training in and attention to HIPAA compliance as well as staunch protection of patient privacy. It is important to note that some breaches of patient privacy may not meet the qualifications of a HIPAA violation, yet they should still be avoided at all costs. This is critical for protecting patients, their relationship with healthcare professionals, and the integrity of your institutional account. See Tip 9 for further guidance on this issue.

Tip 5

Get posting!

With a thoughtful SoMe plan and a capable and supported team, trust the plan and personnel to execute your strategy. Pay close attention to feedback; note what works well and what doesn’t. A quick list of strategic elements that boost audience engagement includes frequent and relevant posts, original content, regular interaction with others’ content, use of media and links in posts and hashtags where appropriate, providing reliable information, responding to audience questions, and tagging others in posts when appropriate 33, 34 .

Tip 6

Course correct when necessary

Carefully monitor metrics during the first weeks and months to determine whether the strategy is working, and which components may need alteration. If readership or engagement is suboptimal, work to expand content distribution through faculty networks or additional SoMe platforms and troubleshoot the approach with PR. If engagement is flourishing, but there is little progress towards department goals, the strategy may not target the correct audience, or content may need to shift. This may take several iterations and experimentation with content. Even with flawless strategy, progress towards many larger department goals through SoMe channels takes time, and teams may have to wait longer to see that return on investment.

Tip 7

What to post: a mission-based approach

Balancing creativity with authenticity is always a challenge, but can be achieved with a thoughtful, mission-based approach 15 . This approach involves relating all content to the original mission/goal of the department SoMe account. Engaging with and amplifying professionals and other departments with similar strategic goals and objectives will enhance reach and credibility. Keeping internal lists of relevant accounts to periodically repost or reply to can be used to facilitate intentional interaction 33 . When in doubt, use the platform to amplify achievements from the department’s faculty, staff, and trainees; your audience has chosen to receive your content and is thus interested in department stories. Using hashtags in posts may help to increase content visibility and reach 35 . Lastly, avoid all arguments on a department account. These are rarely effective and can harm the department’s image 15 .

Tip 8

Always remember Inclusion, Diversity, Access, and Equity (IDA&E)

For all the benefits offered by SoMe, one of the most prominent downsides is the ease at which it allows the propagation of biases, discriminatory attitudes, and misinformation. Never amplify problematic posts. Take great care to be mindful of unconscious biases when creating posts, as even accidental missteps have the potential to be magnified on SoMe. Accordingly, the implementation of tools such as implicit bias training and a code of conduct for team members may help educate and formalize efforts in the minimization of biases in curated content. A diverse SoMe team and multiple eyes on posts can help ensure that only responsible and respectful content is shared, and that images and content accurately reflect the diversity of the department, institution, and community served. If a misstep occurs, a thorough acknowledgement and apology, including publicly stated steps taken to prevent similar missteps in the future, are likely to go a long way toward repairing trust.

Tip 9

Common pitfalls

Be aware of and avoid the common pitfalls of SoMe. Institutional accounts are not immune to autonomous ‘bot’, spam, and otherwise disingenuous accounts. Do not engage 36, 37 .

As a trusted authority in healthcare, content shared by academic medical departments, as trusted healthcare authorities, is likely assumed true by the audience. This includes reposts and shared content from other sources through departmental accounts. Verify that anything posted is true before publishing 36 , and avoid posting individual opinions from an institutional account 34 . In addition to harming the department account’s perceived trustworthiness and professionalism, these posts are unlikely to help achieve the prescribed department goals. It may sometimes be helpful or necessary to use disclaimers in account descriptions or posts such as “medicine is individual; seek your healthcare professional for medical advice” or “content not intended as medical advice.”

Be vigilant and proactive about harassment and keep the institution’s PR department informed about potential safety concerns. Bad-actor accounts may attempt to discredit account content or reputations and spread misinformation; again, the best response to bad-faith posts is to not engage 36, 37 .

Finally, take extensive care to avoid violating HIPAA. This can sometimes be difficult to navigate in an online world. Luckily, many resources exist in the literature to guide the development of educational posts in a HIPAA-compliant manner 38 . Some content, while not an explicit violation of HIPAA, may still contain potentially identifying information, and additional steps should be taken to combat even remote possibilities of patient identification or the sharing of sensitive information. When in doubt, leave it out.

Tip 10

It takes time

All aspects of a successful SoMe strategy require a significant investment of time and resources to implement successfully. This is likely a more significant time commitment than any single full-time faculty member has to devote. Setting clear and reasonable responsibilities for SoMe team members is essential. Additionally, using efficiency techniques can help, such as scheduling posts ahead of time when possible, to account for schedule fluctuations in your schedule or blocking off dedicated calendar time for curating and creating posts.

Just as it takes time to implement a successful strategy, it also takes time to realize the benefits of SoMe use as a department. Trust that if you build it (SoMe presence) well, they (your audience) will come.

Tip 11

Revisit goals often

Even after establishing and implementing an effective strategy, revisiting goals and progress often ensures ongoing success. The SoMe landscape shifts over time, and departments may need to adjust audience, platform, or content to meet these changes. The decision to remain on or leave a platform is fundamentally individual. However, provided you are not diluting your attention to the detriment of content quality or not compromising department or team values, a policy of slow migration to alternative platforms will likely preserve the most readership. SoMe readership trends which shift rapidly away from one platform can equally rapidly shift back. Additionally, your department goals may also change over time, so periodically tweaking the strategy is a healthy component of a strategic plan. At these points, also reassess needs and resources and identify where there are opportunities to request additional support.

Tip 12

Cross-post when possible to extend content reach

While there are undeniable benefits to a SoMe presence on multiple platforms, this does not mean you need to also multiply your content creation speed. A focus on quality over quantity of content has proven a lucrative tradeoff for our division. For example, we have found success in sharing blog posts that may be of interest to a broader audience on X (formerly Twitter) concurrently. However, this may not work in the opposite direction; not all SoMe posts translate to useful blog content. Understanding your audience on each platform and cross-posting content to relevant sites whenever possible can help extend the reach of your message and create a cohesive department image that stands alone and is not tied to any particular service. Your audience will not fault you for seeing the same content in two different places. This becomes especially crucial as platforms shift. Maintaining shared content across multiple sites ensures that a single fading platform does not threaten your entire presence.

Conclusions

In the years since the medical community has had a significant presence on SoMe, the benefits of incorporating its use at the individual, department, and institutional levels are profound. Here, we have presented 12 tips for successfully implementing SoMe at the department level. The first six tips could serve as a roadmap for installing a new departmental SoMe presence, while the last six incorporate best practices for department SoMe accounts at all stages of maturity.

It is important to remember that the cornerstone of a SoMe strategy is your department and your content, not where it is posted. Platforms serve only to mediate content delivery between you and your readers. Therefore, principles that are effective on one platform will likely translate to others. Diversification of platform usage is the best defense against the shifting site allegiances of your audience. However, the addition of alternative platforms in your strategy is more difficult to manage, but it also extends your department’s reach, as new platforms are an opportunity to reach a new audience, benefiting your presence as a whole. In short, a successful strategy involves the thoughtful and intentional definition of your SoMe strategic purposes and goals, the creation and encouragement of a dedicated team with protections for time, talent, and creative license, the recruitment of colleagues to provide and promote content, attentive and careful post creation with consideration for common SoMe pitfalls and IDA&E, and the establishment of multiple SoMe accounts with shared content to form a cohesive department image.

But does this strategy work? Because individual members of a division also influence their visibility through their academic contributions and professional activities, it is impossible to know to what degree a divisional strategy plays in individual successes. Anecdotally, in the first five years of the division’s SoMe strategy, UNMC ID saw an increase in national speakers and national society committee members among faculty (particularly in early-career faculty), several new faculty and fellow candidates recruited through SoMe, and the publication of multiple SoMe scholarly works in the literature 15, 28, 34 . The SoMe strategy may have potentially contributed to achieving the goal of increased divisional national presence and recognition by highlighting individual faculty accomplishments and raising the visibility of their hard-earned talent and expertise. The benefits of SoMe use are expansive, but the learning curve can be steep. We hope these tips will help spark similar success in other departments’ SoMe efforts.

Funding Statement

The author(s) declared that no grants were involved in supporting this work.

[version 3; peer review: 3 approved, 2 approved with reservations]

Data availability

No data are associated with this article.

References

  • 1. Fieger E, Fadel K: #Medtwitter: an open source medical community [version 2]. MedEdPublish (2016). 2021;10(19):19. 10.15694/mep.2021.000019.2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Griffis HM, Kilaru AS, Werner RM, et al. : Use of social media across US hospitals: descriptive analysis of adoption and utilization. J Med Internet Res. 2014;16(11): e264. 10.2196/jmir.3758 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Ryder JH, Mowrer C, Van Roy Z, et al. : Adoption and utilization of social media among adult and pediatric Infectious Diseases divisions and fellowship programs in the United States. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2023;10(3): ofad065. 10.1093/ofid/ofad065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kauffman L, Weisberg EM, Fishman EK: Not only for career networking: can LinkedIn be used for radiology education? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2022;51(2):166–170. 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Raupach T, Muenscher C, Anders S, et al. : Web-based collaborative training of clinical reasoning: a randomized trial. Med Teach. 2009;31(9):e431–437. 10.1080/01421590903095502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Triola MM, Holloway WJ: Enhanced virtual microscopy for collaborative education. BMC Med Educ. 2011;11: 4. 10.1186/1472-6920-11-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Rosenthal S, Howard B, Schlussel YR, et al. : Humanism at heart: preserving empathy in third-year medical students. Acad Med. 2011;86(3):350–358. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318209897f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Fischer MA, Haley HL, Saarinen CL, et al. : Comparison of blogged and written reflections in two medicine clerkships. Med Educ. 2011;45(2):166–175. 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03814.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Chretien K, Goldman E, Faselis C: The reflective writing class blog: using technology to promote reflection and professional development. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(12):2066–2070. 10.1007/s11606-008-0796-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Cheston CC, Flickinger TE, Chisolm MS: Social media use in medical education: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(6):893–901. 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31828ffc23 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Colbert GB, Topf J, Jhaveri KD, et al. : The social media revolution in nephrology education. Kidney Int Rep. 2018;3(3):519–529. 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Titanji BK, Abdul-Mutakabbir JC, Christophers B, et al. : Social media: flattening hierarchies for women and Black, Indigenous, People Of Color (BIPOC) to enter the room where it happens. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(Suppl_3):S222–S228. 10.1093/cid/ciac047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Widmer RJ, Mandrekar J, Ward A, et al. : Effect of promotion via social media on access of articles in an academic medical journal: a randomized controlled trial. Acad Med. 2019;94(10):1546–1553. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002811 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Cawcutt KA, Erdahl LM, Englander MJ, et al. : Use of a coordinated social media strategy to improve dissemination of research and collect solutions related to workforce gender equity. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019;28(6):849–862. 10.1089/jwh.2018.7515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Marcelin JR, Cawcutt KA, Shapiro M, et al. : Moment vs movement: mission-based tweeting for physician advocacy. J Hosp Med. 2021;16(8):507–509. 10.12788/jhm.3636 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Chan WS, Leung AY: Use of social network sites for communication among health professionals: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(3):e117. 10.2196/jmir.8382 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Luc JGY, Stamp NL, Antonoff MB: Social media in the mentorship and networking of physicians: important role for women in surgical specialties. Am J Surg. 2018;215(4):752–760. 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Royan R, Pendergrast TR, Woitowich NC, et al. : Physician and biomedical scientist harassment on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6): e2318315. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.18315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Pendergrast TR, Jain S, Trueger NS, et al. : Prevalence of personal attacks and sexual harassment of physicians on social media. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(4):550–552. 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.7235 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Valero MV: Thousands of scientists are cutting back on Twitter, seeding angst and uncertainty. Nature. 2023;620(7974):482–484. 10.1038/d41586-023-02554-0 37587303 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Suarez-Lledo V, Alvarez-Galvez J: Prevalence of health misinformation on social media: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1): e17187. 10.2196/17187 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Arora VM, Wray CM, O'Glasser AY, et al. : Using the curriculum vitae to promote gender equity during the COVID-19 pandemic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(39): 24032. 10.1073/pnas.2012969117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Cabrera D, Roy D, Chisolm MS: Social media scholarship and alternative metrics for academic promotion and tenure. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15(1 Pt B):135–141. 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Milli S, Carroll M, Pandey S, et al. : Twitter's algorithm: amplifying anger, animosity, and affective polarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:230516941,2023. Reference Source
  • 25. Bradshaw AS: #DoctorsSpeakUp: exploration of hashtag hijacking by anti-vaccine advocates and the influence of scientific counterpublics on Twitter. Health Commun. 2023;38(10):2167–2177. 10.1080/10410236.2022.2058159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Taylor J: X, formerly Twitter, rolls out US$1 annual fee for new users in New Zealand and the Philippines. Platform owned by Elon Musk says subscription trial is aimed at combating bots on the service. 2023; Accessed Tuesday, October 23rd, 2023, Reference Source
  • 27. Chinthakayala KC, Zhao C, Kong J, et al. : A comparative study of three social networking websites. World Wide Web. 2014;17(6):1233–1259. 10.1007/s11280-013-0222-8 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Marcelin JR, Cortes-Penfield N, Del Rio C, et al. : How the field of infectious diseases can leverage digital strategy and social media use during a pandemic. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(2): ofab027. 10.1093/ofid/ofab027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Comp G, Dyer S, Gottlieb M: Is TikTok the next social media frontier for medicine? AEM Educ Train. 2021;5(3). 10.1002/aet2.10532 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Evans E, Gory LB, O'Kane A: TikTok: an opportunity for antibiotic education? Innov Pharm. 2022;13(4). 10.24926/iip.v13i4.4916 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Meyer M, Shoukfeh R, Turk D, et al. : Misinformation about Monkeypox on TikTok. Skinmed. 2023;21(4):248–251. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Univeristy of Nebraska Medical Center: Division of infectious diseases. blog home. Reference Source
  • 33. Fick L, Potini Y, Axon K: Twelve tips for creating your program's social media footprint [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2019;8(169):169. 10.15694/mep.2019.000169.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Cawcutt KA, Marcelin JR, Silver JK: Using social media to disseminate research in infection prevention, hospital epidemiology, and antimicrobial stewardship. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019;40(11):1262–1268. 10.1017/ice.2019.231 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. O'Glasser A, Desai SS, Cooney TG: Twelve tips for tweeting as a residency program [version 1]. MedEdPublish. 2019;8:156. 10.15694/mep.2019.000156.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Ferrara E, Cresci S, Luceri L: Misinformation, manipulation, and abuse on social media in the era of COVID-19. J Comput Soc Sci. 2020;3(2):271–277. 10.1007/s42001-020-00094-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Cawcutt KA, Marcelin JR, Cortés-Penfield N, et al. : #SoMe the money! Value, strategy, and implementation of social media engagement for infectious diseases trainees, clinicians, and divisions. Clin Infect Dis. 2022;74(Suppl_3):S229–S236. 10.1093/cid/ciac063 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Dong SW, Nolan NS, Chavez MA, et al. : Get privacy trending: best practices for the social media educator. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021;8(3): ofab084. 10.1093/ofid/ofab084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
MedEdPublish (2016). 2025 Jan 6. doi: 10.21956/mep.22308.r40538

Reviewer response for version 3

Thomas Cochrane 1

This is an interesting article but has significant omissions currently that could be included to increase impact and critical use awareness.

Start with some SoMe usage stats (rather than simply broad statements of usage) to highlight the reach of these platforms in different countries - also a comparison of the different SoMe platforms in different countries are important to highlight relevant platforms to target as these vary across countries.

Tip1 - Explore the growth of LinkedIn and BlueSky as alternatives to X - as BlueSky is now tracked via Altmetrics and has become the default new home of many academics leaving X.

A short discussion of understanding who owns the key SoMe platforms and their different IP policies is also important - e.g. Facebook owns everything you post on it and Instagram as well; WhatsApp has security issues etc.!

Tip3 - Explore the link between SoMe and Altmetrics more deeply as a key part of the SoMe strategy/tips as platforms tracked by various Altmetrics (Altmetrics, Dimensions, PlumX, etc…) are the key for amplifying impact via linking article DOIs that represent peer-reviewed sources of research and information. - this should part of Tip3.

Our sources - Altmetric

The link between SoMe platforms, usage stats and Altmetrics are keys to SoMe impact beyond celebrities/influencers.

Tip5 - should include integrate source DOIs (when available - and choose publishing platforms that support assigning DOIs - e.g. Figshare, OJS, OSF, that can then be embedded in Blog posts) into SoMe posts for linking to trusted sources and Altmetrics tracking!

Tip9 - include moderation of SoMe posts

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Partly

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Partly

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Social media, educational technology, technology enhanced learning, open educational practice

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : A Framework for Amplifying the Teaching-Research Nexus Impact: Leveraging Altmetrics via Figshare. ASCILITE Publications .2022; 10.14742/apubs.2022.239 10.14742/apubs.2022.239 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. : Research productivity of health care policy faculty: a cohort study of Harvard Medical School. Scientometrics .2020;124(1) : 10.1007/s11192-020-03433-5 107-130 10.1007/s11192-020-03433-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. : A correlation comparison between Altmetric Attention Scores and citations for six PLOS journals. PLoS One .2018;13(4) : 10.1371/journal.pone.0194962 e0194962 10.1371/journal.pone.0194962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. : Technology Enhanced Learning, Research Impact and Open Scholarship. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology .2018;34(3) : 10.14742/ajet.4640 10.14742/ajet.4640 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
MedEdPublish (2016). 2025 Jan 3. doi: 10.21956/mep.22308.r40492

Reviewer response for version 3

Matthew S Katz 1

The edits made by the authors have addressed my prior comments. I have no further questions and think the manuscript reads well and would be a valuable addition to the literature.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

NA

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Dec 17. doi: 10.21956/mep.22308.r40545

Reviewer response for version 3

Philomina Pomaah Ofori 1

  1. The authors have written a very important masterpiece on how to approach social media platforms as a healthcare department.

  2. Although the introduction solely focused on X, there are other platforms for sharing healthcare information. It is vital to discuss other digital platforms and how they enhance information dissemination.

  3. Before the abbreviation, write FTE and HIPAA in full.

  4. The authors failed to account for the diversity within various healthcare departments. It is important to address that.

  5. “Understanding and knowing your audience's interests” could have been a tip, where you will address issues about how the audience perceives SoMe information.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

My research interest is in digital healthcare and emerging healthcare technologies. My peer-reviewed articles have focused on social media healthcare and digital health information.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Nov 30. doi: 10.21956/mep.22044.r39610

Reviewer response for version 2

Matthew S Katz 1

Overall, the authors provide useful guidance on getting started. The main critique is that there should be some team education about ethical use that is compliant with best practices. A specific area of concern would be the risk of sharing stories that undermine patient trust by sharing too much information. This breach of trust can occur even if not disclosing PHI. 

That cautionary component of protecting patient privacy should still be central to any purpose-based use of social media by healthcare institutions or professionals.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Partly

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

social media use in healthcare

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to state that I do not consider it to be of an acceptable scientific standard, for reasons outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Sep 11. doi: 10.21956/mep.22044.r38666

Reviewer response for version 2

Dink Jardine 1

I appreciate the update provided by the group and enjoyed re-reviewing. Thank you.

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Oto-HNS, Med education, policy and accrediation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 May 31. doi: 10.21956/mep.21600.r36487

Reviewer response for version 1

Dink Jardine 1

I appreciate the practical application of the work and the supported evidence for recommendations.  Admittedly there are few rigorous evidenced base practices available for social media use to support professional activities within medicine and medical education. 

Some specific considerations include the following:

 Tip 3 - expansion on "how to define success" would be helpful for the reader.  Are their literature references that support any specific metrics or could be used for benchmarking?  Also other platforms success as Reddit/TikTok/Tumblr/Quora/Threads were not included and may be a consideration if a larger update is being considered.  Current reporting in lay press is that Threads has more users than X now. 

Tip 8-9 may benefit from discussion on how to address if unconscious bias or unintended perception occurs with a specific post.  Are their resources the authors are aware of to turn to if a post becomes a misstep?  Also as expansion of HIPAA discussion to include the ethics of any potentially identifiable information even when not truly HIPAA. 

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Yes

Reviewer Expertise:

Oto-HNS, Med education, policy and accrediation

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Aug 8.
Jasmine Marcelin 1

Thank you for taking the time to review our article and the opportunity to respond. Please find our responses below in point-by-point fashion.

Reviewer comment 1: Tip 3 - expansion on "how to define success" would be helpful for the reader.  Are their literature references that support any specific metrics or could be used for benchmarking?  Also other platforms success as Reddit/TikTok/Tumblr/Quora/Threads were not included and may be a consideration if a larger update is being considered.  Current reporting in lay press is that Threads has more users than X now. 

Response: We thank the reviewer for these suggestions, which greatly expanded the impact of Tip 3. We have expanded this section to include the platforms mentioned by the reviewer, as well as to comment on platform features such as ‘verified account status.’ Unfortunately, we could not find any references in the literature objectively assessing the use of certain metrics over others for academic/medical account success benchmarking. We have included a sentence in this paragraph discussing this and bolstering the fact that account success is a highly individualized concept and likely looks different from department to department, which each forms different goals and strategies.

Reviewer comment 2: Tip 8-9 may benefit from discussion on how to address if unconscious bias or unintended perception occurs with a specific post.  Are their resources the authors are aware of to turn to if a post becomes a misstep?  Also as expansion of HIPAA discussion to include the ethics of any potentially identifiable information even when not truly HIPAA. 

Response: We agree with the reviewer regarding the importance of expanding on detecting unconscious bias in Tip 8. We have added additional commentary discussing implicit bias training and a formalized code of conduct as tools to promote the detection of bias in content. We have also included a statement on recovering from missteps after they occur in Tip 8. Similarly, we have expanded our HIPAA content to include reviewer suggestions regarding advice in sharing information which is not a HIPAA violation but remains ethically dubious

MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.21956/mep.21600.r36322

Reviewer response for version 1

Laurel Fick 1

This article briefly reviews the role of SoMe in departmental engagement with the public or through professional connections.  While the tips aren't necessarily novel, the pivot to using them to develop departmental accounts (versus residency or individual accounts) hasn't been discussed previously, per my knowledge. The submission article references some of the elements of shifting landscapes within SoMe.

Some thoughts:

- Re: Tip 3 shifting landscape would consider including TikTok as an example of an emerging platform

- Similarly, curious about the authors' perspective on "verified" status, subscription or only sending content to followers versus public dissemination, or other premium features

- Consider using "hashtags" on tip 5 (Bhayani RK; et al., 2020 [Ref 1])

- Re: tips 2 and 8- consider a recommendation for implicit bias training for all members of the team, consider a 'code of conduct' for members to sign 

- Re: tip 7-- "Lists can be used to facilitate intentional interaction"- it isn't clear to me what this means-- what type of lists??

- Re: online safety for Tip 9 would consider commenting about dealing with bullies and monitoring the accounts for spam.  For this tip might also consider the importance of a disclaimer- "this isn't medical advice" or something similar.

For the conclusions you reference an increased national presence and recognition attributed to the SoMe strategy- do you have the data / graphs to support this?

If evidence from practice is presented, are all the underlying source data available to ensure full reproducibility?

Not applicable

Is the topic of the practical tips discussed accurately in the context of the current literature

Yes

Are all factual statements correct and adequately supported by citations?

Yes

Are the conclusions drawn balanced and justified on the basis of the presented arguments?

Yes

Are arguments sufficiently supported by evidence from the published literature and/or the authors’ practice?

Partly

Reviewer Expertise:

Graduate Medical Education; Physician Wellbeing.

I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard, however I have significant reservations, as outlined above.

References

  • 1. : Twelve Tips for Utilizing Residency Program Social Media Accounts for Modified Residency Recruitment. MedEdPublish (2016) .2020;9: 10.15694/mep.2020.000178.1 178 10.15694/mep.2020.000178.1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
MedEdPublish (2016). 2024 Aug 8.
Jasmine Marcelin 1

Thank you for taking the time to review our article and the opportunity to respond. Please find our responses below in point-by-point fashion.

Reviewer comment 1: Re:  Tip 3 shifting landscape would consider including TikTok as an example of an emerging platform

Response: We thank the reviewer for this important suggestion and agree that TikTok’s emergence and recent utilization by health professionals warrant discussion in our manuscript. We have included additional commentary on the rise of TikTok as an emerging platform and included additional references to support this in the revised manuscript.

Reviewer comment 2: Similarly, curious about the authors' perspective on "verified" status, subscription or only sending content to followers versus public dissemination, or other premium features

Response: We agree with the reviewer that this is an important piece of social media strategy that also deserves discussion. Therefore, we have added commentary on this in Tip 3 of the revised manuscript.

Reviewer comment 3: Consider using "hashtags" on   tip 5 (Bhayani RK; et al., 2020 [Ref 1])

Response: We now have included hashtags in our list of strategic elements to boost audience engagement within Tip 5 of the revised manuscript. We also include this recommendation within the text of Tip 7. We thank the reviewer for this suggestion.

Reviewer comment 4: Re:  tips 2 and 8- consider a recommendation for implicit bias training for all members of the team, consider a 'code of conduct' for members to sign 

Response: We share the reviewer’s thoughts regarding the importance of bias training and formalized conduct documents as part of a successful and inclusive SoMe strategy. We have amended tip 8 to include this recommendation in the revised document and thank the reviewer for this important addition.

Reviewer comment 5: - Re:  tip 7-- "Lists can be used to facilitate intentional interaction"- it isn't clear to me what this means-- what type of lists??

Response: Thank you for pointing this out. We have updated this sentence to enhance the clarity of our point with this sentence, which reflects a systematic way to ensure interaction with other relevant accounts on SoMe platforms.

Reviewer comment 6: Re: online safety for   Tip 9 would consider commenting about dealing with bullies and monitoring the accounts for spam.  For this tip might also consider the importance of a disclaimer- "this isn't medical advice" or something similar.

Response: We thank the reviewer for these important additions to our pitfalls of SoMe section and have included them in tip 9 of the updated manuscript.

Reviewer comment 7: For the conclusions you reference an increased national presence and recognition attributed to the SoMe strategy- do you have the data / graphs to support this?

Response: We thank the reviewer for this question. This is very difficult to quantify given multiple factors beyond our control. We have clarified this in the conclusion with the following revision: “Because individual members of a division also influence their visibility through their academic contributions and professional activities, it is impossible to know to what degree a divisional strategy plays in individual successes.  Anecdotally, in the first five years of the division’s SoMe strategy, UNMC ID saw an increase in national speakers and national society committee members among faculty (particularly in early-career faculty), several new faculty and fellow candidates recruited through SoMe, and the publication of multiple SoMe scholarly works in the literature 15,29,35 .  The SoMe strategy may have potentially contributed to achieving the goal of increased divisional national presence and recognition by highlighting individual faculty accomplishments and raising the visibility of their hard-earned talent and expertise.”

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    No data are associated with this article.


    Articles from MedEdPublish are provided here courtesy of Association for Medical Education in Europe

    RESOURCES