Table 2.
Summary of frames dropped due to lack of face in frame, away looks, and low-confidence from iCatcher.
| % of no-face frames | % of away frames | % of frames with iCatcher confidence <.85 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tasks (# of trials) | Age 6 | Age 12 | Age 6 | Age 12 | Age 6 | Age 12 |
| Geo-Social Attention (10) | 3.4 | 5.8 | 9.4 | 2.6 | 9.7 | 9.3 |
| The Visual Paired Comparison (VPC) (6) | 4.4 | 11.7 | 19.7 | 14.8 | 10.2 | 11.4 |
| Prediction (14) | 3.0 | 8.6 | 8.4 | 7.2 | 21.4 | 19.6 |
| Audio-Visual Synchrony (8) | 3.9 | 7.7 | 11.2 | 7.1 | 11.7 | 10.7 |
| Word Comprehension (20) | 5.1 | 5.8 | 21.6 | 11.9 | 9.0 | 9.8 |
| Numeracy (4) | 4.1 | 4.3 | 10.2 | 7.7 | 5.8 | 7.5 |
| Helper/Hinderer (2) | 7.8 | 7.3 | 12.6 | 10.9 | 11.3 | 12.5 |
% of no-face frames = iCatcher+ was not able to identify a face in the frame (e.g., child’s head was not in view or child was looking back at parent).
% of away frames = iCatcher+ detected a face but gaze was estimated to be off screen.
% of frames with iCatcher confidence <.85 (probability that iCatcher+ prediction of class is correct based on softmax function).