Table 2.
Descriptive statistics for evaluations of hiring decisions.
|
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EXPLORATORY QUESTION | CREDENTIAL CONDITION | DESCRIPTIVES – MEAN (SD) | CONDITION × CANDIDATE STATUS INTERACTION | CONTRAST | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| STAR | NON-STARS AGGREGATED | F(2, 929) | p | ηp2 | t | p | ||
|
| ||||||||
| Racism | No | 1.74 (0.76) | 1.73 (0.68) | 106.16 | <.001 | .186 | 0.20 | .841 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-racist | 1.38 (0.63) | 1.99 (0.74) | –19.12 | <.001 | ||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-sexist | 1.57 (0.71) | 1.69 (0.73) | –3.67 | <.001 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Sexism | No | 1.79 (0.83) | 1.78 (0.74) | 90.71 | <.001 | .163 | 0.32 | .747 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-racist | 1.61 (0.73) | 1.73 (0.79) | –3.31 | .001 | ||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-sexist | 1.41 (0.66) | 2.07 (0.80) | –17.70 | <.001 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Morality | No | 3.40 (0.96) | 3.20 (0.84) | 10.92 | <.001 | .023 | 4.41 | <.001 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-racist | 3.66 (0.92) | 3.20 (0.80) | 10.15 | <.001 | ||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-sexist | 3.67 (0.91) | 3.23 (0.81) | 9.88 | <.001 | ||||
|
| ||||||||
| Immorality | No | 2.35 (1.13) | 2.22 (0.92) | 14.13 | <.001 | .030 | 2.54 | .011 |
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-racist | 2.87 (1.26) | 2.34 (0.90) | 9.62 | <.001 | ||||
|
|
|
|||||||
| Non-sexist | 2.70 (1.19) | 2.27 (0.90) | 7.91 | <.001 | ||||
|
| ||||||||