Table 4.
Hierarchical regression for willpower and disgust, Study 1.
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WILLPOWER | DISGUST | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| B | SE | β | t | p | B | SE | β | t | p | |
|
| ||||||||||
| (Constant) | 1.77 | .64 | 2.76 | .006 | .45 | .39 | 1.15 | .249 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BMI | .05 | .04 | .12 | 1.31 | .192 | .02 | .02 | .09 | 1.01 | .312 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Self-perceived weight | –.39 | .21 | –.17 | –1.85 | .066 | –.24 | .13 | –.17 | –1.86 | .064 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
F(2, 248) = 1.71, p = .184 R2adjusted = .006 |
F(2, 248) = 1.83, p = .162 R2adjusted = .007 |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| (Constant) | 4.20 | .90 | 4.69 | <.001 | 2.38 | .56 | 4.26 | <.001 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BMI | .01 | .03 | .01 | .17 | .868 | .01 | .02 | .02 | .26 | .796 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Self-perceived weight | –.23 | .20 | –.10 | –1.16 | .246 | –.17 | .12 | –.12 | –1.39 | .165 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Individualizing foundations | –.62 | .12 | –.29 | –4.98 | <.001 | –.42 | .08 | –.33 | –5.43 | <.001 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Binding foundations | .43 | .11 | .23 | 3.89 | <.001 | .12 | .07 | .11 | 1.77 | .077 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
F(4, 246) = 12.35, p < .001 ΔF(2, 246) = 22.70, ΔR2 = .154, p < .001 |
F(4, 246) = 9.92, p < .001 ΔF(2, 246) = 17.76, ΔR2 = .124, p < .001 |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Note: Each dependent variable was analyzed in a separate regression model. Variables are grouped in the table for presentation purposes only.