Table 5.
Hierarchical regression for discrimination and collective action, Study 1.
|
| ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DISCRIMINATION | COLLECTIVE ACTION | |||||||||
|
|
|
|||||||||
| B | SE | β | t | p | B | SE | β | t | p | |
|
| ||||||||||
| (Constant) | .49 | .56 | .88 | .380 | 2.47 | .73 | 3.39 | <.001 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BMI | .05 | .03 | .15 | 1.64 | .102 | .01 | .04 | .01 | .16 | .874 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Self-perceived weight | –.39 | .19 | –.19 | –2.07 | .039 | .07 | .24 | .03 | .27 | .785 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
F(2, 248) = 2.17, p = .116 R2adjusted = .009 |
F(2, 248) = .17, p = .846 R2adjusted = –.007 |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
| (Constant) | 3.24 | .78 | 4.17 | <.001 | –1.74 | 1.03 | –1.68 | .094 | ||
|
| ||||||||||
| BMI | .02 | .03 | .06 | .65 | .518 | .03 | .04 | .07 | .82 | .416 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Self-perceived weight | –.25 | .17 | –.12 | –1.48 | .141 | –.05 | .23 | –.02 | –.20 | .844 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Individualizing foundations | –.64 | .11 | –.35 | –5.91 | <.001 | .87 | .14 | .36 | 6.06 | <.001 |
|
| ||||||||||
| Binding foundations | .29 | .10 | .18 | 3.03 | .003 | –.11 | .13 | –.06 | –.88 | ,381 |
|
| ||||||||||
|
F(4, 246) = 13.62, p < .001 ΔF(2, 246) = 24.65, ΔR2 = .164, p < .001 |
F(4, 246) = 9.94, p < .001 ΔF(2, 246) = 19.69, ΔR2 = .138, p < .001 |
|||||||||
|
| ||||||||||
Note: Each dependent variable was analyzed in a separate regression model. Variables are grouped in the table for presentation purposes only.