Table 1.
Studies 1a,1b,1c – Indirect Effects in the Path Analyses for Global Impression of Experts.
|
| |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PREDICTOR | MEDIATOR | FINANCIAL ADVISOR | CAR MECHANIC | PHYSICIAN | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
| BETA | SE | Z | P | BETA | SE | Z | P | BETA | SE | Z | P | ||
|
| |||||||||||||
| Effectiveness | Perceived competence |
.28 | 0.37 | 4.88 | <.001 | .25 | 0.30 | 4.86 | <.001 | .34 | 0.38 | 6.34 | <.001 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Effectiveness × Intention | –.06 | 0.29 | –1.47 | .142 | .01 | 0.25 | .32 | .749 | –.02 | 0.37 | –.46 | .645 | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Intention | .08 | 0.22 | 2.27 | .023 | .04 | 0.18 | 1.15 | .251 | .14 | 0.30 | 3.25 | .001 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
| Effectiveness | Perceived morality |
.18 | 0.31 | 3.59 | <.001 | .16 | 0.32 | 2.97 | .003 | .13 | 0.34 | 2.72 | .006 |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Effectiveness × Intention | –.06 | 0.43 | –1.12 | .264 | –.03 | 0.44 | –.43 | .668 | .09 | 0.45 | 1.52 | .128 | |
|
|
|
||||||||||||
| Intention | .30 | 0.38 | 5.06 | <.001 | .22 | 0.33 | 4.03 | <.001 | .32 | 0.39 | 5.63 | <.001 | |
|
| |||||||||||||
Note: Beta: standardized path coefficients; SE: standard errors; Z: Z statistics; p: p values for the significance of the paths.