Skip to main content
. 2024 Aug 19;37:15. doi: 10.5334/irsp.887

Table 3.

Unstandardised Coefficients for Predictors on Mediators, and Coefficients for the Predictors and Mediators on Outcome Variable.


DEPENDENT VARIABLE B SE T CI95% DEPENDENT VARIABLE B SE T CI95%

Processing R2 = .13, F(2,305) = 22.9, p < .001 Meta-Perceived VC R2 = .05, F(2,305) = 8.45, p < .001

Co-Reflection .72 .13 5.50 [0.46, 0.97] Co-Reflection .58 .14 4.08 [0.30, 0.85]

Individual Reflection .80 .13 6.17 [0.55, 1.06] Individual Reflection .35 .14 2.47 [0.07, 0.62]

Model 1: Avoidance R2 = .31, F(4,303) = 34.5, p < .001 Model 2: Minimisation R2 = .20, F(4,303) = 19.2, p < .001

Co-Reflection –1.32 .16 –8.21 [–1.63, –1.00] Co-Reflection –.76 .16 –4.65 [–1.08, –0.44]

Individual Reflection –1.09 .16 –6.77 [–1.40, –0.77] Individual Reflection –.61 .16 –3.71 [–0.93, –0.29]

Processing –.31 .07 –4.23 [–0.45, –0.16] Processing –.18 .07 –2.38 [–0.32, –0.03]

Meta-Perceived VC .03 .07 0.50 [–0.10, 0.17] Meta-Perceived VC –.23 .07 –3.36 [–0.36, –0.10]

Model 3: Genuine Forgiveness R2 = .45, F(4,303) = 63.2, p < .001 Model 4: Unforgiveness R2 = .35, F(4,303) = 40.2, p < .001

Co-Reflection .22 .09 2.18 [0.02, 0.41] Co-Reflection –.34 .12 –2.77 [–0.58, –0.10]

Individual Reflection .10 .10 1.06 [–0.09, 0.30] Individual Reflection .10 .12 0.79 [–0.14, 0.34]

Processing .13 .05 2.96 [0.04, 0.22] Processing –.09 .06 –1.58 [–0.20, 0.02]

Meta-Perceived VC .49 .04 11.9 [0.41, 0.57] Meta-Perceived VC –.48 .05 –9.44 [–0.58, –0.38]

Note. No-reflection is the reference condition. The bottom panel contains four models (separate analyses).