Table 3.
Results of the threshold and saturation effect analysis of relative fat mass (RFM) and gallstones
| Outcome | Gallstone |
|---|---|
| Model 1 | |
| Linear effect | 1.09(1.08,1.10) < 0.0001 |
| Model 2 | |
| breaking point (K) | 21.63 |
| <K-segment effect 1 | 1.49(0.80,2.77) 0.2072 |
| >K-segment effect 2 | 1.09(1.07, 1.10) < 0.0001 |
| Difference between 2 and 1 effects | 0.73(0.39,1.36) 0.3207 |
| LLR | 0.190 |
Models 1 and 2 are evaluations of linear and nonlinear relationships, respectively. It is usually assumed that when the likelihood ratio (LLR) is less than 0.05, there is a nonlinear association between the independent and dependent variables.