Skip to main content
. 2023 Jul 28;36:12. doi: 10.5334/irsp.751

Table 4.

Replication study experimental design.


IV1: Outcome [Between] IV1: Outcome manipulation
Outcome: Success
IV1: Outcome manipulation
Outcome: Failure
IV2: Decision-maker [Between] Manipulation:
‘The operation succeeded.’
Manipulation:
‘The operation failed.’

IV2: Decision-maker manipulation condition A
Decision-maker: Patient
Manipulation: Participant was told ‘the patient decided to go ahead with the operation’.
Dependent variables
Decision quality:
‘Please evaluate the physician’s/patient’s decision on a scale from 3 (Clearly correct and the opposition decision would be inexcusable) to –3 (Incorrect and inexcusable).’
Perceived outcome importance:
‘Do you think you should take the outcome into account in evaluating the decisions? Please rate on a scale from 1 (Definitely not) to 5 (Definitely yes).’
Perceived responsibility:
Item: ‘Rate the level of responsibility of the patient for the decision made to go ahead with the operation on a scale from 1 (No responsibility) to 7 (Full responsibility).’
Perceived norms:
Item: ‘Do you think that most people in this situation would decide to go ahead with the operation? Please rate on a scale from 1 (Definitely not) to 5 (Definitely yes).’

IV2: Decision-maker manipulation condition B
Decision-maker: Physician
Manipulation: Participant was told ‘his (the patient’s) physician decided to go ahead with the operation.’