Table 7.
Comparison of effects between the target article and our replication.
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| DECISION-MAKERS | ORIGINAL EFFECT SIZE ESTIMATE (dpaired) AND 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS | REPLICATION EFFECT SIZE (dindependent) AND 95% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS | REPLICATION INTERPRETATION (LEBEL ET AL., 2019) |
|
| |||
| Patient | 0.21 [–0.23, 0.66] | 0.77 [0.62, 0.93] | Signal and same direction |
|
| |||
| Physician | 0.53 [0.06, 0.99] | 1.10[0.94, 1.26] | Signal and same direction |
|
| |||
| Aggregate of all scenarios | 0.90 [0.37, 1.42] | ||
|
| |||
Note: The effect for the original is for paired samples, whereas our replication is for independent samples and should therefore be interpreted with caution.