Skip to main content
. 2025 Feb 4;111(3):2453–2466. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002267

Table 2.

Results of the models based on enhanced CT imaging

Model Metrics Balanced_accuracy AUC Specificity Sensitivity F1 score
Radiomics model Training set 0.689 (0.644–0.724) 0.857 (0.804–0.900) 0.406 (0.340–0.468) 0.971 (0.928–1.000) 0.573 (0.504–0.634)
Internal validation set 0.634 (0.556–0.712) 0.781 (0.680–0.875) 0.402 (0.297–0.505) 0.867 (0.741–0.970) 0.556 (0.444–0.652)
External validation set 0.665 (0.515–0.813) 0.711 (0.524–0.872) 0.565 (0.360–0.773) 0.765 (0.556–0.944) 0.65 (0.457–0.810)
Clinical model Training set 0.656 (0.597–0.715) 0.786 (0.597–0.715)) 0.941 (0.907–0.971) 0.371 (0.258–0.486) 0.872 (0.838–0.903)
Internal validation set 0.737 (0.646–0.824) 0.836 (0.646–0.824) 0.908 (0.844–0.958) 0.567 (0.390–0.739) 0.883 (0.830–0.926)
External validation set 0.662 (0.523–0.794) 0.733 (0.523–0.794) 0.913 (0.773–1.000) 0.412 (0.188–0.650) 0.778 (0.640–0.885)
Clinincal-radiomics model Training set 0.794 (0.729–0.851) 0.910 (0.729–0.851) 0.931 (0.896–0.963) 0.657 (0.529–0.763) 0.908 (0.876–0.936)
Internal validation set 0.832 (0.747–0.911) 0.876 (0.747–0.911) 0.931 (0.872–0.978) 0.733 (0.565–0.885) 0.920 (0.878–0.959)
External validation set 0.684 (0.555–0.802) 0.821 (0.555–0.802) 0.957 (0.850–1.000) 0.412 (0.182–0.636) 0.800 (0.654–0.897)