Skip to main content
. 2025 Jan 28;111(3):2675–2685. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002249

Table 1.

The characteristics of included studies

First author and publication year Study design Study population (VPI or STAS) Age (average or median) Sex ratio (female vs. male) The number of VPI or STAS patients (Seg/SLR/WR vs. lob) The number of patients receiving adjuvant therapy Tumor size (median, range) The 8th edition Lung Cancer TNM Stage Median follow-up times (months) Study endpoints
Schuchert 2012 RS without PSM VPI Seg: 70.0 ± 8.6 472 vs. 427 115 (39 vs. 76) NR seg:2.0 (1.5–2.8) cm; pT1a-cN0M0 37 RFS
Lob: 68.4 ± 10.1 lob:2.5 (1.8–3.0) cm
Mathey-Andrews 2024 RS with PSM VPI seg:70.0 (62–76) 1569 vs. 999 2227 (147 vs. 2080) Seg:24 Lob:517 ≤2 cm in size cT1a-bN0M0 pT2aN0M0 NR OS
lob:71 (64–75)
Lula Lukadi 2023 RS with PSM VPI seg:67 (59–72) 155 vs. 98 253 (62 vs. 191) Seg:8 Lob:37 ≤3 cm in size cT1a-cN0M0 pT2aN0M0 41 RFS, OS
lob: 64 (58–71)
Kagimoto 2022 RS with PSM VPI seg:69 (66–75) 106 vs. 215 321 (80 vs. 241) Seg:12 Lob:71 ≤2 cm in size cT1a-bN0M0 pT2aN0M0 32 RFS, OS
lob:69 (62–75)
Kagimoto 2021 RS with PSM STAS seg:69 (64–75) 128 vs. 165 293 (107 vs. 186) Seg:15 Lob:95 ≤3 cm in size cT1a-cN0M0 55 RFS, OS
lob:68 (62–75)
Ikeda 2023 RS without PSM STAS 69.4 (21–92) 260 vs. 295 148 (17 [Seg] vs. 112 vs. 19[WR]) 25 ≤3 cm in size pT1N0M0 60.5 RFS, OS
Huang 2022 RS with PSM VPI 70 (35–96) 1094 vs. 899 1497 (111 [Seg] vs. 1386 vs. 416 [WR]) 80 ≤3 cm in size cT1a-cN0M0 pT2aN0M0 33 OS
Altorki 2024 RCT VPI 66.8 (37.8–83.7) 61 vs. 52 113 (57 vs. 56) None ≤2 cm in size cT1a-bN0M0 pT2aN0M0 84 RFS, OS
Yu 2020 RS with PSM VPI NA 809 vs. 577 1386 (386 vs 1000) SLR: 34 Lob:134 2 cm in size cT1a-bN0M0 pT2aN0M0 58 OS
Shiono 2018 RS without PSM STAS SLR: 76 (68–80) 185 vs.329 104 (31 vs. 73) SLR:5 ≤3 cm in size pT1a-cN0M0 48 RFS, OS
Lob: 50
Lob: 68 (60–74)
Yanagawa 2018 RS without PSM STAS NA 13 vs. 207 42 (8 vs. 34) 11 ≤3 cm in size pT1N0M0 55.2 RFS, OS
Ren 2019 RS without PSM STAS SLR: 65.9 ± 8.7 107 vs. 118 225 (43 vs. 182) None ≤3 cm in size pT1a-cN0M0 NR RFS, OS
Lob: 59.4 ± 8.5
Eguchi 2019 RS with PSM STAS SLR: 70 (64–76) 938 vs. 559 607 (218 vs. 389) None ≤3 cm in size pT1N0M0 NR RFS
Lob: 69 (61–75)
Choi 2020 RS without PSM VPI SLR: 67.5 ± 10.1 101 vs. 126 170 (21 vs. 149) None ≤2 cm in size cT1a-bN0M0 pT2aN0M0 46 RFS, OS
Lob: 66.9 ± 10.8
Kadota 2019 RS without PSM STAS SLR: 71 355 vs. 380 137 (27 vs. 110) 11 ≤3 cm in size Stage I 65 RFS, OS
Lob: 67

Lob, lobectomy; NA, not applicable; NR, not reported; PSM, propensity score matching; RS, retrospective study; Seg, segmentectomy; SLR, sublobar resection; STAS, spread through air spaces; TNM, tumor, node and metastasis; VPI, visceral pleural invasion.