Table 4.
Ratios of differences in the number of named women between conditions (pairwise comparisons).
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CONTRAST | RATIO | SE | z-RATIO | p |
|
| ||||
| C vs. GM | 1.19 | 0.04 | 5.50 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| C vs. II | 0.59 | 0.02 | –18.38 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| C vs. FM | 0.84 | 0.02 | –5.79 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| C vs. G* | 0.77 | 0.02 | –9.02 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| GM vs. II | 0.49 | 0.02 | –23.01 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| GM vs. FM | 0.71 | 0.02 | –11.04 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| GM vs. G* | 0.64 | 0.02 | –14.11 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| II vs. FM | 1.44 | 0.04 | 12.66 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| II vs. G* | 1.31 | 0.04 | 9.38 | <.001 |
|
| ||||
| FM vs. G* | 0.91 | 0.03 | –3.27 | .011 |
|
| ||||
Note: N = 2697. C = control condition. GM = generic masculine. II = internal-I. FM = feminine-masculine. G* = gender star. p-values are Bonferroni-corrected (adjusted for 10 tests). Tests were performed on the log scale. Values above 1 indicate a higher number of women named in the left compared to the right condition (e.g, in the first row, more people were named in the C than in the GM condition).