Skip to main content
. 2024 Oct 1;37:17. doi: 10.5334/irsp.522

Table 4.

Ratios of differences in the number of named women between conditions (pairwise comparisons).


CONTRAST RATIO SE z-RATIO p

C vs. GM 1.19 0.04 5.50 <.001

C vs. II 0.59 0.02 –18.38 <.001

C vs. FM 0.84 0.02 –5.79 <.001

C vs. G* 0.77 0.02 –9.02 <.001

GM vs. II 0.49 0.02 –23.01 <.001

GM vs. FM 0.71 0.02 –11.04 <.001

GM vs. G* 0.64 0.02 –14.11 <.001

II vs. FM 1.44 0.04 12.66 <.001

II vs. G* 1.31 0.04 9.38 <.001

FM vs. G* 0.91 0.03 –3.27 .011

Note: N = 2697. C = control condition. GM = generic masculine. II = internal-I. FM = feminine-masculine. G* = gender star. p-values are Bonferroni-corrected (adjusted for 10 tests). Tests were performed on the log scale. Values above 1 indicate a higher number of women named in the left compared to the right condition (e.g, in the first row, more people were named in the C than in the GM condition).