Table 1.
Bastian et al. (2012) Studies 1 and 2: Summary of hypotheses.
|
| |
|---|---|
| HYPOTHESIS | PREDICTION |
|
| |
| 1a | Mind attribution is negatively associated with perceived edibility of animals. |
|
| |
| 1b | Mind attribution is positively associated with negative affect regarding eating animals. |
|
| |
| 1c | Mind attribution is positively associated with moral concern for animals. |
|
| |
| 2 | Being told that animals will be raised for meat consumption (compared to being told they will live as grazing animals) leads to denial of mind for those animals. |
|
| |