Table 7.
Bastian et al. (2012) Studies 1 and 2: Summary of replication based on LeBel et al. (2019) criteria.
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H | HYPOTHESIS DESCRIPTION | METHOD | BASTIAN ET AL. (2012)’S EFFECT SIZE | REPLICATION EFFECT SIZE | REPLICATION EVALUATION |
|
| |||||
| 1a | Mind attribution is negatively associated with perceived edibility of animals. | Pearson Correlation | r = –.42 |
r = –.45 [–.69, –.12] |
Signal-consistent |
|
| |||||
| 1b | Mind attribution is positively associated with negative affect regarding eating animals. | Pearson Correlation | r = .77 |
r = .80 [.62, .90] |
Signal-consistent |
|
| |||||
| 1c | Mind attribution is positively associated with moral concern for animals. | Pearson Correlation | r = .80 |
r = .83 [.68, .91] |
Signal-consistent |
|
| |||||
| 2 | Being told that animals will be raised for meat consumption (compared to being told they will live as grazing animals) leads to denial of mind for those animals. | Paired Samples t-Test | d = 0.40 |
d = 0.30 [.24, .37] |
Signal-inconsistent, smaller |
|
| |||||