Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 19;13:e19821. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19821

Table 1. Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content and radical scavenging activity of Aloysia citrodora leaf extracts obtained using the ultrasound process.

Treatment Independent variables Response variables
T (°C) R A Total phenolics (mg GAE/g) Total flavonoids (mg QE/g) OH IC50 (mg/mL) DPPH IC50 (µg/mL) ABTS •+ IC50 (µg/mL)
T3R2A2 75 1:10 25 133 ± 3.1A 86 ± 1.6BCD 0.75 ± 0.01MN 480 ± 0.4FGH 10.3 ± 0.01NO
T3R3A1 75 1:15 20 93 ± 8.8B 94 ± 8.3AB 0.86 ± 0.01LMN 43 ± 0.6FGH 10.6 ± 0.01MNO
T3R3A2 75 1:15 25 88 ± 17.6B 77 ± 6.2E 0.72 ± 0.01N 35 ± 0.5FGH 9.1 ± 0.08O
T2R3A3 50 1:15 35 80 ± 13.9BC 99 ± 3.1A 1.21 ± 0.01KLM 97 ± 1.9EFGH 15.1 ± 0.18L
T3R1A3 75 1:5 35 69 ± 4.0CD 58 ± 0.7F 3.19 ± 0.06C 162 ± 3.2CDEFGH 37.3 ± 0.15H
T2R3A1 50 1:15 20 68 ± 3.4CD 93 ± 2.0ABC 0.96 ± 0.01LMN 106 ± 2.1EFGH 13.1 ± 0.51LMN
T2R2A1 50 1:10 20 67 ± 4.7CD 84 ± 3.5CDE 1.97 ± 0.06FGHI 117 ± 5.1DEFGH 11.5 ± 0.51MNO
T3R3A3 75 1:15 35 67 ± 7.2CD 94 ± 2.8AB 1.29 ± 0.01JKL 650 ± 0.9EFGH 13.7 ± 0.05LM
T2R2A2 50 1:10 25 66 ± 4.1CD 9 ± 6.1JK 0.88 ± 0.01LMN 124 ± 12.0DEFGH 14.9 ± 0.18L
T2R1A3 50 1:5 35 61 ± 1.4DE 91 ± 4.3ABCD 2.04 ± 0.62FGH 115 ± 3.3EFGH 37.2 ± 1.49H
T2R1A2 50 1:5 25 59 ± 2.8DEF 83 ± 1.3DE 1.89 ± 0.03GHI 103 ± 3.4EFGH 29.8 ± 0.40I
T2R1A1 50 1:5 20 56 ± 1.8DEFG 60 ± 1.3F 2.38 ± 0.06DEF 124 ± 2.4DEFGH 40.6 ± 0.15EFG
T1R2A3 30 1:10 35 56 ± 3.9DEFG 64 ± 1.3F 0.90 ± 0.01LMN 97 ± 11.0EFGH 10.9 ± 0.16MNO
T1R2A2 30 1:10 25 53 ± 0.7DEFGH 37 ± 2.3GH 1.98 ± 0.02FGHI 108 ± 1.1EFGH 28.8 ± 0.67IJ
T3R2A3 75 1:10 35 49 ± 1.9EFGH 62 ± 2.5F 1.69 ± 0.01HIJ 99 ± 3.6EFGH 18.9 ± 0.18K
T2R3A2 50 1:15 25 45 ± 2.3EFGH 76 ± 2.6E 1.23 ± 0.01JKL 96 ± 4.1EFGH 14.6 ± 0.02L
T1R1A3 30 1:5 35 45 ± 0.9EFGH 13 ± 1.1J 1.54 ± 0.08IJK 198 ± 0.6CDEF 31.8 ± 0.09I
T1R1A1 30 1:5 20 43 ± 4.4FGH 32 ± 1.6HI 2.17 ± 0.08EFG 310 ± 6.1BC 41.0 ± 0.84DEF
T3R2A1 75 1:10 20 41 ± 0.5GH 26 ± 1.6I 2.66 ± 0.02D 175 ± 1.5CDEFGH 38.4 ± 0.64FGH
T3R1A1 75 1:5 20 40 ± 2.0GH 25 ± 0.1I 3.46 ± 0.01BC 182 ± 0.5CDEFG 44.2 ± 0.60CD
T2R2A3 50 1:10 35 40 ± 2.9GH 44 ± 1.8G 2.31 ± 0.02DEFG 293 ± 23.5BCD 26.4 ± 0.61J
T3R1A2 75 1:5 25 40 ± 2.4GH 24 ± 2.5I 3.22 ± 0.28C 161 ± 5.4CDEFGH 37.6 ± 0.40GH
T1R1A2 30 1:5 25 38 ± 1.9H 7 ± 1.4JK 1.87 ± 0.02GHI 226 ± 3.7CDE 46.1 ± 0.22C
T1R2A1 30 1:10 20 21 ± 0.9I 11 ± 0.8JK 2.58 ± 0.01DE 412 ± 9.7B 63.1 ± 0.27B
T1R3A2 30 1:15 25 21 ± 1.0I 25 ± 0.2I 2.70 ± 0.02D 459 ± 61.5B 37.6 ± 0.77GH
T1R3A3 30 1:15 35 15 ± 1.5IJ 11 ± 1.0JK 3.90 ± 0.03B 232 ± 7.5CDE 42.4 ± 1.63DE
T1R3A1 30 1:15 20 3 ± 2.1J 8 ± 0.8JK 12.23 ± 0.29A 1,790 ± 291.0A 81.6 ± 4.41A
Oligopin 11 ± 0.4IJ 26 ± 2.1K 1.04 ± 0.04LMN
Gallic acid 2.35 ± 0.09H 0.91 ± 0.02P
Ascorbic acid 8.25 ± 0.18GH
Trolox 0.12 ± 0.07P

Notes.

T
Temperature
R
Ratio leaf extract/water
A
Amplitude

Different letters (A, B, C, D, etc.) in the same column indicate significant differences at p < 0.05 (ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test) n = 3.

IC50, half of the maximum effective concentration.