Table 2.
Standardized regression coefficients in predictions of values (rows) from value orientation factors (columns). In italics: core political values. Bold faced numbers: links expected from base model. All coefficients are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Means and SDs of the value ratings in the two rightmost columns.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VALUE | SELF-TRAN-SCENDENCE | CONSER-VATION | SELF-ENHANCE-MENT | OPENNESS TO CHANGE | M a | SD |
|
| ||||||
| Personal values | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Universalism | 0.76 | 0.28 | 4.67 | 0.80 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Benevolence | 0.48 | 0.39 | 4.84 | 0.83 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Conformity | 0.33 | 0.41 | 0.45 | –0.19 | 3.76 | 1.05 |
|
| ||||||
| Security | 0.32 | 0.47 | 4.21 | 1.03 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Tradition | 0.34 | 0.54 | 3.83 | 0.99 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Power | 0.88 | 0.38 | 2.89 | 0.94 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Achievement | 0.52 | 0.21 | 2.95 | 1.14 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Self-direction | 0.56 | 4.40 | 0.90 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Stimulation | 0.64 | 3.30 | 1.15 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Hedonism | 0.60 | 3.94 | 1.03 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Political values | ||||||
|
| ||||||
| Accept immigrants | 0.45 | –0.41 | 3.39 | 1.16 | ||
|
| ||||||
| Equality | 0.57 | 3.63 | 0.99 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Civil liberties | 0.34 | 4.12 | 0.81 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Environment | 0.46 | 4.41 | 0.84 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Traditional morality | 0.82 | 2.37 | 1.00 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Law and order | 0.73 | 2.35 | 0.98 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Blind patriotism | 0.59 | 1.91 | 1.04 | |||
|
| ||||||
| Free enterprise | –0.22 | 0.29 | 0.33 | 2.08 | 0.99 | |
|
| ||||||
| Military intervention | 0.19 | 2.33 | 1.06 | |||
|
| ||||||
aThe means for personal values were computed by reversing the scale responses, after reversal going from 1 = Not like me at all to 6 = Very much like me. The ratings of core political values scale went from 1 = Completely disagree to 5 = Completely agree.