Table 1.
Descriptive Bivariate Correlations with Humanity Gap and Multiple Regression Analysis of Ideological Variables and Humanity Gap, Controlled for Participants’ Socioeconomic Status (Pilot Study).
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DESCRIPTIVE | CORRELATIONS | REGRESSION ON THE HUMANITY GAP | ||
|
| ||||
| F (10, 739) = 25.32**, R2 = .245 | ||||
|
| ||||
| MEANS (SDs) | r | β (SE) | 95% CI | |
|
| ||||
| Group dominance | 2.75 (1.24) | .382** | 3.34 (.735)** | [1.90; 4.79] |
|
| ||||
| Anti-egalitarianism | 2.47 (1.14) | .255** | –.74 (.814) | [–2.34; .86] |
|
| ||||
| System justification | 2.12 (0.97) | .212** | 2.02 (.724)** | [.60; 3.44] |
|
| ||||
| Political orientation | 3.94 (1.26) | .363** | .90 (.649) | [–.37; 2.18] |
|
| ||||
| Tolerance to inequality | 3.73 (1.14) | .240** | –.57 (.873) | [–2.28; 1.14] |
|
| ||||
| Hostile classism | 2.74 (1.34) | .438** | 4.22 (.682)** | [2.88; 5.56] |
|
| ||||
| Protective paternalist | 5.39 (1.42) | .165** | .66 (.534) | [–.39; 1.71] |
|
| ||||
| Complementary class differentiation | 4.66 (1.34) | –.015 | –.50 (.535) | [–1.55; .55] |
|
| ||||
| Subjective social class | 5.34 (2.86) | .130** | .61 (.534) | [–.43; 1.66] |
|
| ||||
| Objective social class | 5.91 (1.42) | .054 | .22 (.262) | [–.29; .74] |
|
| ||||
Note: ** p ≤ .001; * p ≤ .05.