Table 2.
Descriptive Statistics and Correlations Between Measures (Study 1).
|
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEANS (SDs) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 1. Group dominance | 2.70 (1.23) | – | .455** | .477** | .326** | .463** | .421** | –.496** | –.311** | –.334** | .092* | .048 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 2. System justification | 3.88 (1.28) | – | .558** | .319** | .679** | .670** | –.501** | –.380** | –.373** | .176** | –.043 | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| 3. Hostile classism | 2.67 (1.31) | – | .383** | .570** | .406** | –.384** | –.331** | –.337** | .107* | –.058 | ||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 4. Humanity gap | 6.82 (19.86) | – | .320** | .345** | –.250** | –.259** | –.092* | .110* | .082† | |||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 5. Blaming low-SES groups | –1.35 (1.76) | – | .661** | –.508** | –.439** | –.434** | .132** | –.004 | ||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 6. Praising high-SES groups | –1.08 (1.87) | – | –.559** | –.494** | –.352** | .169** | .004 | |||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 7. Support for redistribution policies | 4.88 (1.51) | – | .607** | .401** | –.103* | –.008 | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 8. Support for progressive taxation | 5.03 (1.69) | – | .297** | –.114* | –.013 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 9. Support for welfare policies | 4.91 (1.31) | – | –.016 | .036 | ||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 10. Subjective social class | 5.86 (1.43) | – | .399** | |||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| 11. Objective social class | 5.37 (2.96) | – | ||||||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
Note: SES = Socioeconomic status; ** p ≤ .001; * p ≤ .05; † p ≤ .07.