Table 3.
Multiple Regression Analysis of Ideological Variables and Dependent Variables (Study 1).
|
| ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HUMANITY GAP | BLAMING LOW-SES GROUPS | PRAISING HIGH-SES GROUPS | REDISTRIBUTION POLICIES | PROGRESSIVE TAXATION | WELFARE POLICIES | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| F(5, 502) = 24.68**, R2 = .189 | F(5, 500) = 112.36**, R2 = .524 | F(5, 497) = 86.93**, R2 = .461 | F(5, 494) = 51.53**, R2 = .336 | F(5, 494) = 21.44**, R2 = .170 | F(5, 494) = 22.60**, R2 = .178 | |||||||
|
| ||||||||||||
| β(SE) | 95% CI | β(SE) | 95% CI | β(SE) | 95% CI | β(SE) | 95% CI | β(SE) | 95% CI | β (SE) | 95% CI | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Group dominance | .158 (.766)** | [1.05; 4.06] | .127 (.051)** | [.08; .28] | .144 (.059)** | [.10; .33] | –.329 (.053)** | [–.50; –.30] | –.135 (.066)** | [–.31; –.06] | –.175 (.051)** | [–.29; –.09] |
|
| ||||||||||||
| System justification | .114 (.787)* | [.22; 3.31] | .485 (.053)** | [.56; .76] | .595 (.061)** | [.75; .99] | –.318 (.054)** | [–.48; –.27] | –.229 (.068)** | [–.43; –.17] | –.220 (.052)** | [–.33; –.12] |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Hostile classism | .251 (.767)** | [2.28; 5.29] | .247 (.052)** | [.23; .43] | .000 (.059) | [–.12; .12] | –.053 (.053) | [–.17; .04] | –.140 (.066)** | [–.31; –.05] | –.138 (.051)** | [–.24; –.04] |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Subjective social class | .020 (.620) | [–.94; 1.50] | –.012 (.042) | [–.10; .07] | .049 (.048) | [–.03; .16] | –.003 (.043) | [–.09; .08] | –.035 (.053) | [–.15; .06] | .060 (.041) | [–.03; .14] |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Objective social class | .085 (.297)† | [–.01; 1.16] | .026 (.020) | [–.02; .06] | .003 (.023) | [–.04; .05] | –.004 (.021) | [–.04; .04] | –.009 (.026) | [–.06; .05] | .005 (.020) | [–.04; .04] |
|
| ||||||||||||
Note: SES = Socioeconomic status; ** p ≤ .001; † p ≤ .09.