Skip to main content
. 2023 Jun 8;36:7. doi: 10.5334/irsp.753

Table 5.

Effects of System Justification Manipulations on Variables, Controlled for Participants’ Socioeconomic and Real Ideological Standings (Study 2B).


HUMANITY GAP BLAMING LOW-SES GROUPS PRAISING HIGH-SES GROUPS WELFARE POLICIES REDISTRIBUTION POLICIES PROGRESSIVE TAXATION

Main effect F(1, 200) = 49.40, P < .001, ηp2=.203 F(1, 200 = 318.87, p < .001, ηp2=.622 F(1, 200) = 320.27, p < .001, ηp2=.623 F(1, 200) = 212.11, p < .001, ηp2=.024 F(1, 200) = 276.92, p < .001, ηp2=.588 F(1, 200) = 201.47, p < .001, ηp2=.509

High-system justification:
M = 53.37; SD = 27.14
Low-system justification:
M = 20.47; SD = 34.22
High-system justification:
M = 2.79; SD = 2.43
Low-system justification:
M = -2.78; SD = 1.80
High-system justification:
M = 2.32; SD = 2.01
Low-system justification:
M = -2.73; SD = 1.87
High-system justification:
M = 2.69; SD = 1.58
Low-system justification:
M = 5.68; SD = 1.10
High-system justification:
M = 2.33; SD = 1.44
Low-system justification:
M = 5.69; SD = 1.32
High-system justification:
M = 2.83; SD = 1.56
Low-system justification:
M = 5.75; SD = 1.19

Covariates

    Subjective social class F(1, 200) = .10, p = .754, ηp2=.001 F(1, 200) = .012, p = .911, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .00, p = .961, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .04, p = .845, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .31, p = .580, ηp2=.002 F(1, 200) = .506, p = .478, ηp2=.003

    Objective social class F(1, 200) = .48, p = .490, ηp2=.002 F(1, 200) = .189, p = .664, ηp2=.001 F(1, 200) = .76, p = .386, ηp2=.004 F(1, 200) = .017, p = .896, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .02, p = .878, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .019, p = .889, ηp2=.000

    Dominance orientation F(1, 200) = .29, p = .593, ηp2=.001 F(1, 200) = .030, p = .863, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .37, p = .544, ηp2=.002 F(1, 200) = .44, p = .510, ηp2=.002 F(1, 200) = .07, p = .791, ηp2=.000 F(1, 200) = .366, p = .546, ηp2=.002

    System Justification F(1, 200) = 3.77, p = .054, ηp2=.019 F(1, 200) = 1.10, p = .297, ηp2=.006 F(1, 200) = 1.31, p = .254, ηp2=.007 F(1, 200) = 2.18, p = .141, ηp2=.011 F(1, 200) = 1.37, p = .244, ηp2=.007 F(1, 200) = 1.84, p = .177, ηp2=.009

    Hostile classism F(1, 200) = 6.00, p = .015, ηp2=.030 F(1, 200) = 7.40, p = .007, ηp2=.037 F(1, 200) = 1.67, p = .197, ηp2=.009 F(1, 200) = 1.66, p = .199, ηp2=.008 F(1, 200) = 2.06, p = .153, ηp2=.010 F(1, 200) = 2.90, p = .090, ηp2=.090