Table 6.

Effects of Hostile Classism Manipulations on Variables, Controlled for Participants’ Socioeconomic and Real Ideological Standings (Study 2C).

	HUMANITY GAP	BLAMING LOW-SES GROUPS	PRAISING HIGH-SES GROUPS	WELFARE POLICIES	REDISTRIBUTION POLICIES	PROGRESSIVE TAXATION
Main effect	F(1, 202) = 133.1, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.404$	F(1, 202) = 149.22, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.432$	F(1, 202) = 49.75, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.202$	F(1, 202) = 95.40, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.\text{327}$	F(1, 202) = 72.64, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.\text{27}0$	F(1, 202) = 105.57, p < .001, ${\eta }_p^2=.\text{350}$
	Hostile classism: M = 66.04; SD = 31.91 Non-hostile classism_: M = 14.72; SD = 27.28	Hostile classism: M = 3.42; SD = 2.33 Non-hostile classism: M = 1.26; SD = 2.90	Hostile classism: M = 1.68; SD = 2.00 Non-hostile classism: M = .53; SD = 2.22	Hostile classism: M = 2.51; SD = 1.58 Non-hostile classism: M = 4.85; SD = 1.77	Hostile classism: M = 2.06; SD = 1.59 Non-hostile classism: M = 4.21; SD = 1.94	Hostile classism: M = 2.31; SD = 1.45 Non-hostile classism: M = 4.66; SD = 1.76
Covariates
Subjective social class	F(1, 202) = .06, p = .813, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = 1.40, p = .237, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{7}$	F(1, 202) = .77, p = .380, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{4}$	F(1, 202) = .19, p = .664, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{1}$	F(1, 202) = .41, p = .524, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{2}$	F(1, 202) = .12, p = .731, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{1}$
Objective social class	F(1, 202) = .00, p = .961, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = .54, p = .463, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{3}$	F(1, 202) = .01, p = .932, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = 1.56, p = .213, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{8}$	F(1, 202) = .01, p = .941, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = .104, p = .747, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{1}$
Dominance orientation	F(1, 202) = 4.16, p = .043, ${\eta }_p^2=.0\text{21}$	F(1, 202) = 4.54, p = .034, ${\eta }_p^2=.0\text{23}$	F(1, 202) = .92, p = .338, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{5}$	F(1, 202) = 5.72, p = .018, ${\eta }_p^2=.028$	F(1, 202) = 3.03, p = .083, ${\eta }_p^2=.0\text{15}$	F(1, 202) = 6.76, p = .010, ${\eta }_p^2=.0\text{33}$
System Justification	F(1, 202) = .00, p = .968, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = .31, p = .580, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{2}$	F(1, 202) = .17, p = .679, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{1 }$	F(1, 202) = .83, p = .363, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{4}$	F(1, 202) = .40, p = .528, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{2}$	F(1, 202) = .002, p = .968, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$
Hostile classism	F(1, 202) = .06, p = .809, ${\eta }_p^2=.000$	F(1, 202) = .18, p = .669, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{1 }$	F(1, 202) = .45, p = .502, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{2}$	F(1, 202) = .38, p = .540, ${\eta }_p^2=.00\text{2}$	F(1, 202) = 1.92, p = .168, ${\eta }_p^2=.01\text{0}$	F(1, 202) = 1.29, p = .257, ${\eta }_p^2=.007$