Table 3:

Multi-Level Models: Relations of Collaboration and Appraisal to Mood and Coping

	Happy		Negative mood		Effective Coping
Collaboration
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
age	.01(.01); p=.276	.01(.01); p=.269	−.01(.00); p=.110	−.01(.00); p=.108	−.00(.01), p=.990	.00(.01); p=.930
education	−.01(.05); p=.812	−.01(.05); p=.809	.01(.03); p=.861	.01(.03); p=.855	−.07(.04); p=.085	−.08(.04); p=..072
income	.03(.03); p=.265	.03(.03); p=.262	−.05(.01); p<.001	−.05(.02); p<.001	.01(.02); p=.593	.01(.02); p=.498
BP	.32(.08); p<.001	.28(.08); p=.001	−.14(.05); p=.004	−.16(.05); p=.001	.36(.07); p<.001	.26(.07); p<.001
WP	.06(.02); p=.006	.06(.03); p=.026	−.01(.02); p=.484	−.01(.02); p=.810	.19(.03); p<.001	.12(.04); p<.001
time	−.18(.04); p<.001	−.18(.04); p<.001	−.15(.03); p<.001	−.15(.03); p<.001	−.53(.05), p<.001	−.53(.05); p<.001
BP X time		.09(.05); p=.050		.05(.03); p=.074		.22(.05); p<.001
WP X time		.00(.04); p=.977		−.01(.02); p=.572		.13(.04); p=.002
Appraisal
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
income	.02(.03); p=.432	.02(.03); p=.429	−.05(.01); p=.001	−.05(.01); p=.001	−.01(.02); p=.779	−.01(.02); p=.783
BP	.37(.13); p=.005	.28(.13); p=.037	−.21(.07), p=.005	−.23(.08); p=.003	.30(.12); p=.011	.19(.12); p=.131
WP	.10(.05); p=.024	.06(.06); p=.296	−.03(.03); p=.250	−.05(.04); p=.156	.06(.06); p=.317	.17(.07); p=.015
time	−.19(.04); p<.001	−.19(.04); p<.001	−.14(.03); p<.001	−.14(.03); p<.001	−.56(.05); p<.001	−.57(.05); p<.001
BP X time		.17(.07); p=.017		.04(.04); p=.342		.27(.08); p=.002
WP X time		.11(.07); p=.139		.04(.05); p=.416		−.28(.09); p=.003

Note: Time is scored as 0 = Time 1; 1 = Time 2; BP = between person; WP = within-person