Table 4:

Multi-Level Models: Relations of Collaboration and Appraisal to Relationship Outcomes

	Positive Support Index		Negative Support Index
Collaboration
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
age	.01(.00); p=.214	.01(.00); p=.219	.00(.01); p=.727	.00(.01); p=.714
education	−.00(.03); p=.937	−.00(.03); p=.978	−.02(.04); p=.672	−.02(.04); p=.649
income	.00(.02); p=.999	−.00(.02); p=.931	−.05(.02); p=.020	−.05(.02); p=023
BP	.58(.05); p<.001	.54(.05); p<.001	−.02(.07); p=.828	−.04(.07); p=.631
WP	.23(.02); p<.001	.27(.02); p<.001	−.00(.02); p=.878	−.03(.03); p=.232
time	.07(.03); p=.018	.07(.03); p=.013	−.01(.03); p=.881	−.00(.03); p=.892
BP x time		.08(.03); p=.021		.04(.04); p=.267
WP x time		−.09(.02); p<.001		.06(.03); p=040
Appraisal
	Model 1	Model 2	Model 1	Model 2
income	−.02(.02); p=.265	−.03(.02); p=.261	−.07(.02); p=.002	−.07(.02); p=.002
BP	.55(.11); p<.001	.42(.11); p<.001	−.22(.10); p=.029	−.24(.11); p=.026
WP	.29(.04); p<.001	.31(.04); p<.001	−.05(.03); p=.155	−.14(.04); p=.002
time	.09(.04); p=.008	.09(.03); p=.010	−.01(.03); p=.677	−.01(.03); p=.758
BP x time		.25(.06); p<.001		−.01(.06); p=.930
WP x time		−.04(.05); p=.348		.21(.06); p<.001

Time is scored as 0 = Time 1; 1 = Time 2; BP = between person; WP = within-person