Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Aug 25.
Published in final edited form as: Emotion. 2025 Aug 21;26(1):141–152. doi: 10.1037/emo0001568

Table 2.

Correlations for All Study Variables (DERS, Reappraisal, and Suppression)

Abuse Neglect 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19
(3) DERS T1 .18* .22*
(4) DERS T2 .17* .10 .56*
(5) DERS T3 .13 .14 .45* .56*
(6) DERS T4 .15 .13 .47* .47* .60*
(7) DERS T5 .33* .23* .28* .41* .49* .66*
(8) DERS T6 .28* .07 .28* .39* .47* .53* .64*
(9) Reappraisal T1 −.08 .05 −.20* −.20* −.09 −.16 −.16 −.15
(10) Reappraisal T2 −.20* −.05 −.13 −.25* −.27* −.11 −.15 −.07 .44*
(11) Reappraisal T3 −.11 −.13 −.08 −.27* −.24* −.01 −.13 −.13 .30* .53*
(12) Reappraisal T4 −.12 −.06 −.25* −.30* −.24* −.32* −.44* −.25* .33* .28* .42*
(13) Reappraisal T5 −.10 .03 .03 −.20* −.23* −.27* −.33* −.29* .29* .24* .29* .56*
(14) Reappraisal T6 −.05 .11 −.01 −.22* −.14 −.17 −.33* −.33* .14 .25* .38* .53* .59*
(15) Suppression T1 .004 .06 .14 .15 .16 .09 .06 .16 .04 −.07 −.09 −.02 .04 −.14
(16) Suppression T2 .05 −.01 .22* .21* .11 .02 .09 .15 −.05 −.06 .02 −.05 −.01 −.06 .58*
(17) Suppression T3 .14 .05 .13 .07 .05 .02 .04 .03 −.05 −.14 −.01 −.07 −.08 −.10 .53* .62*
(18) Suppression T4 .14 .16 .10 .18* .11 −.06 −.03 −.05 .001 −.05 −.14 −.10 −.10 −.15 .44* .49* .61*
(19) Suppression T5 −.13 .04 .13 .09 .06 −.07 −.01 −.09 −.04 −.01 −.08 −.14 −.06 −.07 .33* .32* .52* .51*
(20) Suppression T6 .15 .08 .05 .03 .04 −.01 −.004 −.09 .13 .02 −.01 −.07 .01 .01 .18 .24* .46* .42* .50*

Note. DERS = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale; T = Time.

*

p < .05.