Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 14;6:nol.a.10. doi: 10.1162/nol.a.10

Table 3. .

Contribution of written and spoken language production measures to explaining FA in the CTC tracts

Predictor B SE β t p VIF
Left CTC
(Constant) 0.435 0.025 17.410 <0.001
Spelling 0.081 0.029 0.322 2.789 0.007** 1.001
RAN −0.005 0.002 −0.260 −2.245 0.028* 1.001
Overall regression: R2 = 0.18, F(2, 62) = 6.6, p = 0.002
Right CTC
(Constant) 0.475 0.029 16.519 <0.001
Spelling 0.085 0.036 0.305 2.356 0.022* 1.008
RAN −0.006 0.003 −0.274 −2.129 0.039* 1.008
Overall regression: R2 = 0.15, F(2, 51) = 4.6, p = 0.014

Note. Multiple regression models predicting cluster-FA in the left and right CTC from spelling accuracy scores and RAN scores. Cluster-FA refers to the mean FA across nodes 3–9 (see Figure 5). RAN scores are the average scaled scores of RAN Letters and RAN Digits. FA = fractional anisotropy, CTC = cerebello-thalamo-cortical tract, RAN = rapid automatized naming, B = unstandardized coefficient, SE = standard error, β = standardized coefficient, VIF = variance inflation factor.

*

p < 0.05.

**

p < 0.01.