Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 15;2025:1610909. doi: 10.1155/da/1610909

Table 5.

Risk ratio of the experimental and control groups at the follow-up stage.

Study Follow-up duration Experimental group Comparison group RR 95% CI Major findings
Events.M Total Events.M Total
[45] 12 month 19 68 11 42 1.07 0.57–2.01 No evidence was found that the coping with depression course prevented depressive episodes
[47] 12 month 37 354 62 354 0.60 0.41–0.87 This result indicates that the risk of developing major depression disorder was significantly lower in the i-CBT group when compared to the control group
[48] 24 month 8 40 16 47 0.59 0.28–1.23 This significant preventive effect persisted, but at a diminished level at the 18- and 24-month follow-ups
[13] 12 month 10 93 20 88 0.47 0.23–0.95 This result indicates that effective treatment of subclinical depression may yield a preventive effect for the exacerbation of depressive symptoms
[54] 6 month 0 20 2 23 0.23 0.01–4.50 The results of this study suggest that CBT is beneficial for residents with subclinical depression
[56] 12 month 0 21 2 20 0.19 0.01–3.75 This study found that the intervention group had a lower MDE incidence than the comparison group, although this difference did not attain statistical significance
[15] 12 month 21 149 41 146 0.50 0.31–0.81 This result demonstrated that, for patients with subclinical depressive symptoms and persistent back pain, intervention significantly reduced the incidence of MDE over a 12-month follow-up period
[42] 12 month 2 36 1 32 1.78 0.17–18.69 The groups did not differ in the proportion of patients that developed clinical anxiety and/or depression
[59] 6 month 6 65 5 59 1.09 0.35–3.38 In fact, except for a very small number of indicated prevention studies in which a decrease in the incidence of depression was found, most studies have only been able to detect reductions in depression symptoms
[60] 12 month 13 107 20 109 0.66 0.35–1.26 The incidence of major depression among participants in the experimental condition was reduced by a third compared with the control condition
Overall: I2 = 0%, RR = 0.62, Sig (p=0.64)
Total RR = 0.62; 95% CI (0.50–0.77)
NNT = 8.79; 95% CI: 6.67–14.55

Abbreviations: CBT, cognitive behavioral therapy; CI, confidence interval; MDE, major depressive episode; NNT, number needed to treat; RR, risk ratio.