Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;29(1):146. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01432-5

Table 10.

Primary outcome – Soft tissue healing

Comparison* Number of sites (primary studies) Measure of effect Effect model Direction of effect Follow up Heterogeneity
PRF vs Spontaneous healing 60 vs 60 (2) SMD= –0.20; 95% CI (–1.82, 1.43) Random No difference 1 day I2= 94.7%
PRF vs Spontaneous healing 70 vs 70 (3) SMD= 0.10; 95% CI (–1.38, 1.58) Random No difference 3 days I2=93.6%
PRF vs Spontaneous healing 115 vs 115 (5) SMD= –0.03; 95% CI (–1.18, 1.13) Random No difference 7 days I2=93.7%
PRF vs Spontaneous healing 90 vs 90 (4) SMD= 0.08; 95% CI (–1.26, 1.41) Random No difference 14 days I2=93.6%
L-PRF vs Spontaneous healing 50 vs 50 (2) SMD = –0.70; 95% CI (–3.50, 2.10) Random No difference 7 days I2 =97%
APC vs Spontaneous healing 78 vs 63 (3) MD= 1.01; 95% CI (0.77, 1.24) Fixed Favors APC 7 days I2=77%

PRF platelet rich fibrin, L-PRF leukocyte - platelet rich fibrin, APC autologous platelet concentrate, SMD standardized mean difference, MD mean difference, CI confidence interval

*Outcome measure: Landry’s healing index, Modified Landry’s healing index