Table 3.
Summary of comparisons between bivariate baseline and genomic marker models including total genetic variance (), additive () and residual genetic () variances, per cent of additive variance (Add. (%)) for each trait and residual log-likelihood (LL) values of each model
| Bivariate | Bivariate genomic | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLeme | BLmat | BLeme | BLmat | |||||||||||||
| Dataset | LL | Add. (%)a |
Add. (%)a |
LL | ||||||||||||
| HS21 | 98.6 | 0.39 | 235.0 | 0.79 | 2800 | b | 97.2 | 0 | 0.38 | 0.00 | 153.9 | 135.1 | 53 | 0.74 | 0.27 | 2782 |
| YK21 | 248.3 | 0.80 | 208.9 | 0.76 | 2588 | b | 247.0 | 0 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 73.8 | 154.9 | 32 | 0.76 | 0.29 | 2565 |
| WN22 | 543.6 | 0.89 | 300.1 | 0.83 | 1289 | b | 543.8 | 0 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 206.0 | 138.9 | 60 | 0.83 | 0.54 | 1277 |
| HS22 | 528.6 | 0.89 | 495.2 | 0.93 | 1252 | b | 529.3 | 0 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 343.5 | 267.1 | 56 | 0.91 | 0.48 | 1245 |
| RS22 | 1.0 | 0.79 | 1.2 | 0.80 | 198 | b | 1.0 | 0 | 0.79 | 0.00 | 0.4 | 0.8 | 32 | 0.79 | 0.26 | 195 |
| YK22 | 256.8 | 0.91 | 184.8 | 0.91 | 1040 | b | 256.8 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.00 | b | 184.8 | 0 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1040 |
| WN23 | 0.2 | 0.25 | 0.4 | 0.27 | 336 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 90 | 0.21 | 0.18 | 1.2 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.24 | 0.24 | 312 |
| HS23 | 0.4 | 0.54 | 1.3 | 0.86 | 357 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 49 | 0.49 | 0.44 | 2.4 | 0.3 | 89 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 299 |
| RS23 | 118.2 | 0.74 | 119.9 | 0.67 | 2099 | 121.2 | 59.9 | 67 | 0.71 | 0.24 | 170.9 | 51.1 | 77 | 0.64 | 0.27 | 2063 |
| YK23 | 74.2 | 0.45 | 174.8 | 0.70 | 2236 | 117.7 | 18.8 | 86 | 0.34 | 0.25 | 311.9 | 0.0 | 100 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 2164 |
aPer cent of additive genetic variance () of the total genetic variance ( + )
badditive genetic variance component not significant (REMLRT of , = 0)