Table 2.
Multiple regression analysis of best corrected visual acuity at 5 and 8 years for stage 4A (n = 35)
| BCVA at age of 5 years old; R = 0.5509 | |||||
| β | SE (β) | stdβ | t-value | P-value | |
| Lens | −0.5316 | 0.1786 | −0.4415 | −2.9766 | 0.00551 |
| Dominant eye at age 5 | −0.4552 | 0.1786 | −0.3779 | −2.5483 | 0.01582 |
| BCVA at age of 8 years old; R = 0.5992 | |||||
| β | SE (β) | stdβ | t-value | P-value | |
| Lens | −0.4714 | 0.1705 | −0.3934 | −2.7652 | 0.00936 |
| Dominant eye at age 5 | −0.5920 | 0.1705 | −0.4941 | −3.4724 | 0.00150 |
| Difference of BCVA between 5 and 8 years old; R = 0.2996 | |||||
| β | SE (β) | stdβ | t-value | P-value | |
| Lens | 0.06024 | 0.08775 | 0.1164 | 0.6865 | 0.49733 |
| Dominant eye at age 5 | −0.1368 | 0.08775 | −0.2643 | −1.5591 | 0.12881 |
BCVA best corrected visual acuity (logMAR acuity), Lens; phakia converted 1, aphakia converted 0, Dominant eye; dominant eye converted 1, non-dominant converted 0
R multiple correlation coefficient, SE standard error