Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;15:30977. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16890-w

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis in esophageal cancer patients.

Variables HR comparison Univariate analysis Multivariable analysis
HR (95%CI) P value HR (95%CI) P value
Sex Male
Female 1.091 (0.931–1.279) 0.280
Race White
Unwhite 1.332 (1.138–1.559) < 0.001 1.034 (0.865–1.237) 0.711
Age <65 years
≥ 65 years 1.170 (1.038–1.318) 0.010 1.122 (0.993–1.268) 0.064
Marriage Married
Unmarried 0.817 (0.725–0.921) 0.001 1.097 (0.971–1.241) 0.138
Chemotherapy No vs. Yes 0.338 (0.295–0.386) < 0.001 0.308 (0.266–0.357) < 0.001
Radiotherapy No vs. Yes 0.874 (0.776–0.985) 0.027 0.835 (0.740–0.942) 0.003*
Histology Adenocarcinoma
Non-adenocarcinoma 1.274 (1.121–1.447) < 0.001 1.026 (0.876–1.203) 0.750
Primary site Overlapping
Cervical/Upper 0.884 (0.596–1.312) 0.541 0.611 (0.407–0.918) 0.018
Thoracic/middle 0.997 (0.757–1.313) 0.981 0.814 (0.612–1.082) 0.157
Abdominal/lower 0.739 (0.576–0.947) 0.017 0.788 (0.612–1.015) 0.065
Surgery No vs. Yes 0.465 (0.353–0.614) <0.001 0.446 (0.333–0.596) < 0.001
Grade I + II
III + IV 1.124 (0.993–1.272) 0.066
T Stage T1
T2 0.770 (0.587–1.010) 0.059 0.879 (0.668–1.158) 0.360
T3 0.814 (0.690–0.960) 0.015 0.956 (0.805–1.135) 0.607
T4 1.183 (1.004–1.394) 0.045 1.227 (1.038–1.451) 0.017
Tx 1.216 (1.008–1.467) 0.041 1.091 (0.894–1.333) 0.391
N Stage N0
N1 0.959 (0.837–1.099) 0.548 1.044 (0.907–1.203) 0.546
Nx 1.490 (1.182–1.879) 0.001 1.226 (0.958–1.568) 0.105
M Stage M1a
M1b 1.749 (1.303–2.349) < 0.001 1.799 (1.325–2.444) < 0.001