Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;16:7811. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63040-x

Fig. 5. Precise manipulation of target cells by DK-MLIR.

Fig. 5

a, b Confocal images and flow cytometric assay of intracellular ROS levels in HeLa cells treated without (Blank) and with 180 nM DK-MLIR (DK-MLIR), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO and 10-min UV irradiation (BSO + UV), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO (BSO), and DK-MLIR in presence of 10-min UV irradiation (UV). Scale bar: 100 µm. c Mitochondrial membrane potential of HeLa cells treated without (Blank) and with 10 μM CCCP (CCCP), 180 nM DK-MLIR, 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO and 10-min UV irradiation (BSO + UV), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO (BSO), and DK-MLIR in presence of 10-min UV irradiation (UV). Scale bar: 50 µm. d, e ATP levels in HeLa cells and AML-12 cells treated without (Blank) and with 180 nM CD63APT-TPP (CD63APT-TPP), 180 nM DK-MLIR (DK-MLIR), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO and 10-min UV irradiation (BSO + UV), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO (BSO), and DK-MLIR in presence of 10-min UV irradiation (UV). Shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3 biologically independent samples). (HeLa, Blank vs CD63APT-TPP, P = 1.86 × 10−5 and Blank vs UV, P = 6.35 × 10−5; AML-12, Blank vs CD63APT-TPP, P = 0.00846 and Blank vs UV, P = 0.291; ****P < 0.0001, **P < 0.01, NS: not significant, two-tailed Student’s t test). f, g The viability assays of HeLa cells and AML-12 cells treated without (Blank) and with 180 nM CD63APT-TPP (CD63APT-TPP), 180 nM DK-MLIR (DK-MLIR), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO and 10-min UV irradiation (BSO + UV), 180 nM DK-MLIR in presence of 100 µM BSO (BSO), and DK-MLIR in presence of 10-min UV irradiation (UV). Shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3 biologically independent samples). (HeLa, Blank vs UV, P = 0.0004; AML-12, Blank vs UV, P = 0.0101; ***P < 0.001, *P < 0.1, two-tailed Student’s t test). Image representation of 3 experiments. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.