Table 4.
Correlation and significance of the effect of different soil levels on Imago parameters (dead pupa, successful Imago, normal Imago and abnormal Imago).
| Statistical value and significance | Dried soil | Watered soil | S. fradiae-treated soil |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dead pupa | |||
| Correlation (r-value) | 0.76905 | 0.73559 | 0.52991 |
| t-value | 2.9471 | 2.66 | 1.531 |
| p-value | 0.025709 | 0.037534 | 0.17675 |
| Successful imago | |||
| Correlation (r-value) | −0.76905 | −0.73559 | 0.52991 |
| t-value | −2.9471 | −2.66 | −1.531 |
| p-value | 0.025709 | 0.037534 | 0.17675 |
| Normal imago | |||
| Correlation (r-value) | −0.69732 | −0.60049 | −0.64387 |
| t-value | −2.383 | −1.839 | −2.061 |
| p-value | 0.054542 | 0.11546 | 0.084909 |
| Abnormal imago | |||
| Correlation (r-value) | −0.75828 | −0.33367 | 0.86736 |
| t-value | −2.849 | −0.867 | 4.269 |
| p-value | 0.029217 | 0.41926 | 0.0052684 |