Table 1.
Comparative chart of the existing methods for the detection of mastitis
| Device and | Basic principle | Somatic cell count | Cost | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
A digital camera takes a pic of the somatic cells' nuclei, which are stained with DNA- DNA-specific fluorescent reagent & counts the cells | < 200 × 103 cell/mL |
Device cost: $4100 Test cost: $2.1 /sample. |
Rapid & Automated | Requires trained personnel, expensive, and not-portable |
|
|
DNA-specific counter based on the principle of optical fluorescence | 50 × 103 cells/mL | Device cost: Test cost: $0.6/sample | Rapid & Automated | Requires special equipment, trained personnel, expensive |
|
LactoscanSCC76
|
low magnification microscope with fast autofocus and cell counting software | 100 × 103 cells/mL |
Device cost: $ 3500 Test cost: $0.5/sample |
Automate, Differential cell count | Not portable, required additional instruments |
|
|
Measurement of the electrical conductivity of the milk | >200 × 103 cells/mL | Devise cost: $1500 | Portable, Rapid | Low accuracy, Other factors can also cause an increase in conductivity |
|
|
Milk amyloid concentration increases due to infection, which can be a good indicator for udder health diagnosis | >150 × 103 cells/mL (0.93 ng/mL) | Kit cost: $6.2/sample | Rapid, Sensitive |
The detection window is very short. Required trained person is required to perform the test |
|
QuantM (This Study) (Supplementary Table 2)
|
Cell-IONP aggregates are formed proportion to the SCC | 0.05 million cells/mL |
Device cost: ~$180 Test cost < $0.10per sample |
Rapid, Portable, User-friendly and Sensitive | Simultaneous processing of multiple samples is not possible. |





