Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;15:30878. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-15399-6

Table 4.

The number of areas of “L–H” mode between high/low educational groups and accessibilities.

Public transport
TA-RLG15 TA-RHG15 TA-NLG15 TA-NHG15 TA-RLG60 TA-RHG60 TA-NLG60 TA-NHG60
19 14 32 16 19 9 17 13
LA-RLG15 LA-NLG15 LA-RLG60 LA-NLG60
18 30 18 27
HA-RHG15 HA-NHG15 HA-RHG60 HA-NHG60
16 17 8 13
Car
TA-RLG15 TA-RHG15 TA-NLG15 TA-NHG15 TA-RLG60 TA-RHG60 TA-NLG60 TA-NHG60
22 13 16 16 1 1 3 1
LA-RLG15 LA-NLG15 LA-RLG60 LA-NLG60
23 38 1 4
HA-RHG15 HA-NHG15 HA-RHG60 HA-NHG60
13 14 1 1

15 and 60 represent travel time threshold. TA-RLG represents spatial relationship between total job accessibility and registered low-education group, TA-RHG represents spatial relationship between total job accessibility and registered high-education group, TA-NLG represents spatial relationship between total job accessibility and registered low-education group, TA-NHG represents spatial relationship between total job accessibility and registered high-education group. LA-RLG represents spatial relationship between low-education job accessibility and registered low-education group, LA-NLG represents spatial relationship between low-education job accessibility and non-registered high-education group, HA-RHG represents spatial relationship between high-education job accessibility and registered high-education group, HA-NHG represents spatial relationship between high-education job accessibility and non-registered high-education group.