Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;15:30926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16937-y

Table 3.

Protective effect of C. officinalis extract against genotoxicity.

CA Control Cos1 Cos2 Mo MoCos1 MoCos2
FRG 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 24.8 ± 2.16a 18.4 ± 1.85b 13.6 ± 1.67c
VC 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 19.6 ± 1.84a 12.9 ± 1.63b 8.40 ± 1.13c
UDC 0.17 ± 0.41d 0.10 ± 0.32d 0.32 ± 0.51d 15.7 ± 1.75a 11.1 ± 1.58b 8.20 ± 1.10c
SC 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 13.4 ± 1.65a 9.70 ± 1.21b 5.90 ± 0.86c
BR 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 10.9 ± 1.24a 7.10 ± 0.98b 4.10 ± 0.79c
DS 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 8.50 ± 1.14a 5.20 ± 0.82b 3.70 ± 0.68c
MpA 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 0.00 ± 0.00d 7.60 ± 0.96a 4.50 ± 0.81b 2.00 ± 0.54c

The values are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 10). The numbers of MN and chromosomal damage were calculated by analysing 1,000 cells in each group, and the MI rate was calculated by analysing 10,000 cells in each group. Means with different letters (a–d) in the same row are considered to be significant at p < 0.05.