Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;15:30960. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-16363-0

Table 7.

Process conditions and weight loss of material obtained in lapping using different metallic and non-metallic tools.

Tool type Workpiece material Abrasive Type Process parameters Processing
time t [min]
Weight loss
of material after a processing time t
Δm [mg]
Max rotational speed
of a tool nt [min−1]
Max unit pressure p [kPa]
Segmented polyamide disc printed by SLS - under investigation in the article Al2O3 Suspension with mixed SD 28/20 and D107 diamond grains 120 12 120 4041
UV-curable resin bond diamond lapping plate [32] Al2O3 Diamond grains with an average size of 15 μm fixed in the resin bond 50 1.77 60 122
Conventional disc made of cast iron [32] Al2O3 Suspension containing diamond grains with an average size of 15 μm 50 1.77 60 185
Conventional disc made of cast iron [33] Tellurium copper Paraffin and oil-based slurry with black silicon carbide grains (98 C F500) 64 3.79 90 932
Electroplated diamond disc with the nickel plating ratio Tb = 35% [5] Al2O3 D107 diamond grains fixed in the thinnest nickel bond 60 14 18 523
Electroplated diamond disc with the nickel plating ratio Tb = 50% [5] Al2O3 D107 diamond grains fixed in the nickel bond of the medium thickness 60 14 18 631
Electroplated diamond disc with the nickel plating ratio Tb = 65% [5] Al2O3 D107 diamond grains fixed in the thickest nickel bond 60 14 18 741