Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 22;9:297. doi: 10.1038/s41698-025-01058-6

Table 1.

Comparing the ABF-CatBoost method’s classification accuracy to that of existing ML techniques

Method Accuracy (%)
RF [47] 95.8
SVM [47] 93.2
KNN [48] 91.11
ANN [48] 86.71
ABF-CatBoost [Proposed] 98.6