Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 1;50(8):530–538. doi: 10.30476/ijms.2025.104015.3746

Table 4.

Potential clinical factors predictive of reproductive organ involvement in previous studies

Study No. of pts No. of ROI Histology Variables
Palpable mass Clinical T stage Preoperative hydronephrosis Clinical LNP Neoadjuvant chemotherapy CIS in TURT Max tumor size in TURT Bladder neck or trigone location Lymphovascular invasion in TURT
Chen 11 1997 115 6 (5.2%) UC NR NR NR NR NR NR NR Risk factors for urethral involvement NR
Varkarakis 18 2007 52 3 (5.7%) UC - - NR - NR NR NR - NR
Djaladat 10 2012 411 21 (7.5%) UC + - + NR - NR NR NR NR
Gregg 16 2016 160 32 (20%) UC + NR NR - NR NR NR + NR
Choi 15 2017 112 11 (9.8%) UC NR - + - NR NR NR + NR
Whittum 13 2018 118 17 (14%) UC+ NR NR NR NR - NR NR + +
non-UC
Taylor 7 2019 123 19 (15%) UC+ NR NR NR NR - NR NR NR NR
non-UC
Bree 12 2021 186 9 (4.8%) UC - - - NR Despite advanced stages in the neoadjuvant group, the rate of ROI was not different between the two groups. NR NR NR NR
Avulova 14 2023 1335 70 (5.2%) UC+ NR NR + NR NR NR NR + NR
non-UC

ROI: Reproductive organ involvement; CIS: Carcinoma in Situ; NR: Not reviewed; UC: Urothelial carcinoma, TURT: Trans-urethral resection of tumor; LNP: Lymph-adenopathy; Pts: Patients;

+

: Positive correlation;

-

: No correlation