Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 23;25:880. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07954-w

Table 2.

Correlation of NT-proBNP, LDH, UA, and PDW levels with adverse pregnancy outcomes

Variable BMI (kg/m2) GA SBP (mmHg) DBP (mmHg) NT-proBNP (pg/mL) LDH (IU/L) PDW (fL) UA (IU/L)
Normal pregnancy outcome (n = 81) 31.16 ± 4.21 38.49 ± 1.36 147.62 ± 13.37 98.26 ± 12.43 72.10(39.45, 147.70) 207.80 ± 47.73 14.42 ± 2.16 339.03 ± 92.07
Adverse pregnancy outcome (n = 84) 30.86 ± 4.45 35.44 ± 3.54 160.32 ± 18.15 106.40±11.58 251.00(144.85, 366.25) 261.24 ± 66.83 15.66 ± 1.82 407.04 ± 95.81
Z/t 0.443 7.26 −5.11 −4.357 −7.583 −5.88 −3.971 −4.646
P-value 0.658 < 0.001 <0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001 < 0.001

BMI body mass index, GA Gestational age, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, NT-proBNP N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, LDH lactate dehydrogenase, PDW platelet distribution width, UA uric acid

P-values were analyzed by Student’s t-test and the Mann–Whitney test