Skip to main content
. 2002 Mar;68(3):1325–1335. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.3.1325-1335.2002

TABLE 2.

Pairwise statistical comparisons of community-level catabolic profiles (CLCP) of rhizosphere samples from T4 lysozyme-producing plants (DL4 and DL5) and control plants (DES and DC1) and aerobe bacterial plate counts

Field Plant growth stage Significant difference in CLCP of rhizosphere samples in plant lines (8 replicates; P < 0.1)a:
Plate countb
DES-DL4 DC1-DL4 DES-DL5 DC1-DL5 DES DC1 DL4 DL5
L (1st yr) Young Yes 7.2 7.1 7.0 7.2
Flowering 7.9 7.7 7.7 7.7
Senescent Yes Yes 7.6 7.5 7.6 7.7
Q (1st yr) Young 7.8 7.7 7.7 7.7
Flowering Yes 7.8 7.7 7.8 7.8
Senescent Yes Yes 7.8A 7.8A 9.0B 7.9A
L (2nd yr) Young Yes Yes 7.3 7.1 7.2 7.4
Flowering 8.2 8.2 8.3 8.2
Senescent 8.6 8.7 8.6 8.5
Q (2nd yr) Senescent Yes Yes 8.2A 8.0A,B 7.9B 8.1A
a

MANOVA on the first five PCs (details in Materials and Methods).

b

Average log10 CFU g−1 (wet weight) of root. Significant differences within a sampling are indicated by different letters (ANOVA; P < 0.1).