Skip to main content
. 2025 Jul 11;5(8):675–688. doi: 10.1038/s43588-025-00832-7

Table 2.

Performance metrics of FedProt and selected meta‑analyses using bacterial and human serum datasets

Dataset Method Mean difference Maximal difference FPa FNa Jaccard similarity coefficienta
Bacterial dataset FedProt 4.45 × 10−13 3.56 × 10−12 0 0 1
Fisher 3.86 25.24 0 1 0.998
Stouffer 3.35 25.00 0 1 0.998
REM 15.61 259.80 8 14 0.964
RankProd 13.42 79.42 0 108 0.820
Human serum dataset FedProt 1.36 × 10−13 6.59 × 10−13 0 0 1
Fisher 0.50 2.79 2 6 0.922
Stouffer 0.57 2.59 2 13 0.854
REM 0.59 11.64 1 13 0.863
RankProd 1.07 8.98 1 33 0.667

Mean and maximum absolute differences in negative log-transformed BH-adjusted P values, Jaccard similarity coefficients, and error rates (FPs and FNs) for the results of FedProt and selected meta-analysis approaches compared with centralized DEqMS results. The lowest differences are shown in bold font.

aThresholds of |log2FC| >0.5 and adjusted P value <0.05 (bacterial dataset) and |log2FC| >0.25 and adjusted P value <0.05 (human serum dataset) were used for Jaccard similarity coefficients, FPs and FNs. Metrics use each method’s own |log2FC| and BH-adjusted P values.