Skip to main content
. 2025 Aug 23;25(1):301. doi: 10.1007/s10238-025-01821-w

Table 2.

CAR-T cell therapies for extramedullary disease in multiple myeloma

CAR target Patient group Patient (n)/ EMD (n) Agent Name Line of previous treatment Efficacy Survival Adverse events Ref
BCMA RRMM

152 (47)

(EM-E: 47)

Ide-cel,

cilta-cel

median 6 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 58% vs. 96%; CR: 28% vs 56%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

mPFS: 5.1 months, 12.4 months; mOS: 12.2 months, 27.5 months

EMD vs. non-EMD: CRS: 81%, 78%; ≥ grade 3 CRS: 11%, 3%; ICANS: 36%, 25%; ≥ grade 3 ICANS: 6%, 7% [57]
BCMA RRMM 269 (112)

Ide-cel,

Cilta-cel

median 6 EMD predicts early relapse/progression post-CAR-T (HR: 1.92) ND ND [62]
BCMA RRMM 20 (5) Cilta-cel median 8 Extramedullary lesions disappeared: 80% ND ND [63]
BCMA RRMM 97 (13) Cilta-cel median 6 ND EMD vs. all patients: mDOR: 12.9 months, 23.3 months ND [64]
BCMA RRMM 128 (50) Ide-cel median 6 ORR of EMD worse than no EMM (no specifics) ND ND [65]
BCMA RRMM 69 (15) Anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR-T cells median 4 EMD: ORR: 80%;

EMD vs. non-EMD: mPFS: 8.3 months, 21.4 months

mOS: 12.3 months, NR;

ND [66]
BCMA RRMM 351 (84) Ide-cel median 6

EMD vs. non-EMD:

90d-ORR: 52%, 82%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

mPFS: 5.3 months, 11.1 months; mOS: 14.8 months, 26.9 months;

EMD vs. non-EMD:

 ≥ grade 3 CRS: 2%, 1.5%; ≥ grade 3 ICANS: 1%, 5%

[58]
BCMA RRMM 61 (27) (EM-B:10, EM-E:7, Both: 10) Anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cells median 3

EMD vs. non-EMD:

CR: 59%, 81%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

1-year PFS rate: 34.4% vs. 60.2%

ND [67]
BCMA RRMM 61 (25) Anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cells median 4

EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 84.00%, 94.44%

 ≥ CR: 36.00%, 61.11%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

mPFS: 121 days, 361 days;

mOS: 248 days, 1024 days

EMD vs. non-EMD:

CRS: 84%, 100%;

 ≥ grade 3 CRS:12%, 27.8%;

ICANS: 0, 2.8%

[68]
BCMA RRMM 33 (9) Ide-cel median 7 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 89%, 83% ND ND [69]
BCMA RRMM 17 (5) LCAR-B38M  ≥ 3 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 80%, 92% EMD: 1-year PFS rate: 20%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

 ≥ Grade 3 CRS: 60%, 33%

[70]
BCMA RRMM 25 (7) Humanized anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cells median 7 EMD: ORR: 57% ND ND [71]
BCMA RRMM 18 (5) CT103A median 4 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 100%, 100%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

1-year PFS rate: 20% vs. 79.1%; 1-year OS rate: 60% vs. 79.1%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

 ≥ Grade 3 CRS: 0, 38.5%

[72]
BCMA RRMM

30 (18)

(EM-E: 18)

Anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cells median 4 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 77.78%, 90% EM-E: median OS: 243 days ND [73]
BCMA RRMM 21 (12) (EM-B:6, EM-E:6) Humanized anti‐BCMA CAR‐T cells  ≥ 5 EM-E vs. EM-B vs. non-EMD: ORR: 83.33%, 83.33%, 88.89% EM-E vs. EM-B vs. non-EMD: 180 days-PFS rate: 50%, 83.33%, 88.89%; 180 days-OS rate: 83.33%, 100%, 88.89%; 360 days-PFS rate: 16.67%, 66.67%, 66.67%; 360 days-OS rate: 33.33%, 83.33%, 88.89% EM-E vs. EM-B vs. non-EMD: CRS: 100%, 100%, 100%; ≥ grade 3 CRS: 50%, 33.3%, 0; ICANS: 50%, 16.7%, 11.1%; ≥ grade 3 ICANS: 0, 0, 0 [74]
BCMA RRMM 49 (11) HDS269B  ≥ 3

EMD vs. non-EMD:

ORR: 64%, 82%

EMD vs. non-EMD: mOS: 5.0 months, 24.0 months; mPFS: 3.0 months, 10.5 months ND [75]
BCMA RRMM 211 (95) Ide-cel median 6

EMD vs. non-EMD:

Progressed ≤ 3 Months: 27.3%, 14.6%

EMD is associated with worse PFS ([HR] = 1.71, 95% CI: 1.16–2.51) and OS (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.00–2.86) ND [76]
BCMA RRMM 2 (2) CT103A 3 Both achieved sCR Survival over 13 and 10 months, respectively EMD: Grade 2 CRS: 1 patient; No ICANS [61]
BCMA RRMM 20 (7) Humanized anti-BCMA CAR-T cells  ≥ 5

EMD vs. non-EMD:

ORR: 71.43%, 84.61%;

Extramedullary lesions: sCR/CR: 85.71%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

180 days-PFS rate: 42.9%, 84.6%; 360 days-PFS rate: 28.6%, 72.5%; 180 days-OS rate:71.5%, 92.3%; 180 days-OS rate: 28.6%, 81.0%

EMD vs. non-EMD:

 ≥ grade 3 CRS: 42.9%, 0

ICANS: 28.6%, 7.7%;

 ≥ grade 3 ICANS: 0, 0

[77]
BCMA RRMM 134 (59) (EM-B: 25; EM-E: 34)

Ide-cel,

cilta-cel

and other

median ≥ 4 EM-E vs. EM-B vs. non-EMD: ORR: 76.5%, 92%, 88%

EM-E vs. EM-B vs. non-EMD:

mPFS: 9 months, 21.4 months, 24.2 months; mOS: 24 months, NR, NR

ND [78]
GPRC5D RRMM 33 (11) Anti-GPRC5D CAR-T cells median 4 EMD vs. non-EMD: ORR: 91%, 91% ND ND [79]
GPRC5D RRMM 10 (4) OriCAR-017 median 5.5

EMD vs. non-EMD:

ORR: 100%, 100%

ND  ≥ grade 3 CRS and ICANS: 0 [80]
BCMA-CS1 RRMM 16 (6) CS1-BCMA CAR-T cells median 4 Extramedullary lesions disappeared: 66.7% ND ND [81]
BCMA-CD38 RRMM 23 (9) BM38 CAR-T cells median 4 EMD: sCR: 44.4%; Extramedullary lesions disappeared: 55.6% ND ND [82]
BCMA-CD19 NDMM 22 (12) (EM-B:9, EM-E:3) GC012F none EMD: sCR: 100%; MRD-: 100% ND ND [83]
BCMA-CD38 RRMM 16 (8) BCMA-CD38 CAR-T cells  ≥ 2 EMD: sCR: 75%; PD: 25%, Extramedullary lesions disappeared: 62.5% ND ND [84]
BCMA-CD19 RRMM 31 (31) (EM-E:31) Anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 CAR-T cells median 4

EMD: ORR: 64.5%;

 ≥ CR: 25.8%

EMD: mPFS: 5.0 months;

mOS: 9.7 months

EMD: CRS: 83.9%; ≥ grade 3 CRS: 25.8%; ICANS: 9.7%; ≥ grade 3 ICANS: 6.5% [85]
BCMA- GPRC5D RRMM 21 (4) BCMA-GPRC5D CAR-T cells median 3 EMD: ORR: 75% ND ND [86]

Abbreviations: EMD, extramedullary disease; RRMM, relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; EM-B, EMD, bone-associated; EM-E, extramedullary extraosseous; ORR, overall response rate; CR, complete response; sCR, stringent complete response; VGPR, very good partial response rate; PD, progressive disease; PFS, progression-free survival; mOS, median overall survival; mPFS, median progression-free survival; ND, no data; NR, not reached; CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; MRD, minimal residual disease; Ide-cel, Idecabtagene vicleucel; Cilta-cel, Ciltacabtagene autoleucel; CAR-T, chimeric antigen receptor T; BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; GPRC5D, G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D; CS1, also named SLAMF7, Signaling Lymphocytic Activation Molecule Family Member 7; mDOR, median duration of response; HR, hazard ratio