Table 1.
Performance comparison of seven machine-learning and deep-learning models for identifying leaf rust-responsive candidate genes
| Model | Accuracy | Recall (TPR) | Specificity (TNR) | Precision (PPV) | Negative predictive value (NPV) | F1-score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Logistic Regression | 0.70 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.75 | 0.63 | 0.75 |
| Random Forest | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| Gradient Boosting | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.75 | 0.85 | 0.86 | 0.88 |
| SVM | 0.60 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.64 |
| LightGBM | 0.80 | 0.92 | 0.63 | 0.79 | 0.83 | 0.85 |
| XGBoost | 0.90 | 1.00 | 0.75 | 0.86 | 1.00 | 0.92 |
| Neural Network | 0.70 | 0.83 | 0.50 | 0.71 | 0.67 | 0.77 |